Truth Hurts
Registered Senior Member
Could this prove that God exists?
Could this senario prove the existence of God?
In a court of law, during a murder trial, and using past pressident from similar cases won in the past from the defense side, I state the following.
When a guy finds his wife in bed with another man, and kills them both, it is said to be a "crime of passion". He loved her so much that her betrayal made him go temporarily insane and commit the two murders in some crazed delution of seeking justice for the betrayal.
If the ambulance chasing lawyer who argues successfully that this man would not have killed, if it were not for the emotion of love.
the emotion of love is responsible for these murders.
"If" the defense wins the case and the man goes free based on the definition that God is the human emotion of love expressed between two people, then this now sets a pressident for future cases.
(a tougher case would be for the prosicution to argue that he never loved his wife, so love is not the motivating force behind these other emotions that caused the murders.)
With the definition of God set by the courts as the human emotion of love, wouldn't this definition end the athiest argument?
(after watching Miracle of 34th street I was amused by the ending that the government stated that since the post office recognized the man on trial as Santa Claus, then he exists and is recognized as Santa Claus. Governments and courts set definitions that in turn imply emphatically that they exist.)..
Could this senario prove the existence of God?
In a court of law, during a murder trial, and using past pressident from similar cases won in the past from the defense side, I state the following.
When a guy finds his wife in bed with another man, and kills them both, it is said to be a "crime of passion". He loved her so much that her betrayal made him go temporarily insane and commit the two murders in some crazed delution of seeking justice for the betrayal.
If the ambulance chasing lawyer who argues successfully that this man would not have killed, if it were not for the emotion of love.
the emotion of love is responsible for these murders.
"If" the defense wins the case and the man goes free based on the definition that God is the human emotion of love expressed between two people, then this now sets a pressident for future cases.
(a tougher case would be for the prosicution to argue that he never loved his wife, so love is not the motivating force behind these other emotions that caused the murders.)
With the definition of God set by the courts as the human emotion of love, wouldn't this definition end the athiest argument?
(after watching Miracle of 34th street I was amused by the ending that the government stated that since the post office recognized the man on trial as Santa Claus, then he exists and is recognized as Santa Claus. Governments and courts set definitions that in turn imply emphatically that they exist.)..