This is a discussion from another forum I'm in...
http://www.simcitycentral.net/forums/index.php
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FourDegreez,
Posted: Wed Jan 22, 2003 9:25 pm Post subject: Re: No more MOJO for expansion paks
SassyLadySim wrote:
Exactly!! Here is a perfect example: articles posted on the official site talked about three styles of buildings: Chicago, 1890; New York, 1940; and Houston, 2000. This one article said, "Each building you see as you play SimCity 4 will be from one of the three periods of architecture." And yet, the ACTUAL building set included with sc4 is extremely limited and it seems there is only ONE residential skyscraper (and it's kind of ugly). They advertised three times the number of buildings as in sc3k, but in my opinion the building variety is actually less. We're going to have to buy an expansion pack to get buildings and other features we were tricked into thinking would be in the sc4 we paid for.
This game is so crippled and buggy, I think they owe us a FREE expansion pack.
It's a shame. And it's not the fault of the designers and developers, either. I'm sure they tried to build the best game they could. But EA surely has its tentacles in there, mucking it all up. It was certainly a management decision to cripple the game and withhold features so that they could release an expansion pack to provide stuff that should have been included with the game. Some management creep probably said to himself, "Gee, we can squeeze more money out of this if we release a crippled version and put out a 'fix' [that's basically what it would amount to] for another $30." That really pisses me off.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The question is: Is it ethical to make people buy expansion packs for their games? They advertise something to get you all crazy to buy the game and suddenly the game misses many features that were promised. Isn't that against the law? To advertize something but sell another? Is it ethical? Is it legal?
Thoughts....
http://www.simcitycentral.net/forums/index.php
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FourDegreez,
Posted: Wed Jan 22, 2003 9:25 pm Post subject: Re: No more MOJO for expansion paks
SassyLadySim wrote:
I was just sitting here wondering how many expansion packs I will have to buy later in order to get the SimCity4 that I thought I had when I purchased it.
Exactly!! Here is a perfect example: articles posted on the official site talked about three styles of buildings: Chicago, 1890; New York, 1940; and Houston, 2000. This one article said, "Each building you see as you play SimCity 4 will be from one of the three periods of architecture." And yet, the ACTUAL building set included with sc4 is extremely limited and it seems there is only ONE residential skyscraper (and it's kind of ugly). They advertised three times the number of buildings as in sc3k, but in my opinion the building variety is actually less. We're going to have to buy an expansion pack to get buildings and other features we were tricked into thinking would be in the sc4 we paid for.
This game is so crippled and buggy, I think they owe us a FREE expansion pack.
It's a shame. And it's not the fault of the designers and developers, either. I'm sure they tried to build the best game they could. But EA surely has its tentacles in there, mucking it all up. It was certainly a management decision to cripple the game and withhold features so that they could release an expansion pack to provide stuff that should have been included with the game. Some management creep probably said to himself, "Gee, we can squeeze more money out of this if we release a crippled version and put out a 'fix' [that's basically what it would amount to] for another $30." That really pisses me off.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The question is: Is it ethical to make people buy expansion packs for their games? They advertise something to get you all crazy to buy the game and suddenly the game misses many features that were promised. Isn't that against the law? To advertize something but sell another? Is it ethical? Is it legal?
Thoughts....