Does being successful in life necessarily mean being upwardly mobile class-wise?
You can have a perfectly acceptable standard of life without being rich, but some people seem determined to castigate those who want to have jobs that are seen as “blue collar” while others castigate people for trying to improve their lot beyond what certain factions would like.
It appears that the government has the idea that the best way to help the poorest people is to encourage them to be more “middle class” - trying to get everyone to go to college, for example, so they can be lawyers and doctors. But what’s wrong with being a builder or a bus driver or whatever? Why do we undermine the idea of people being successful in their own terms, not in terms of what other people think they should want? Do we reward the wrong thing in our society - power and position, rather than sacrifice and effort?
Peace.
You can have a perfectly acceptable standard of life without being rich, but some people seem determined to castigate those who want to have jobs that are seen as “blue collar” while others castigate people for trying to improve their lot beyond what certain factions would like.
It appears that the government has the idea that the best way to help the poorest people is to encourage them to be more “middle class” - trying to get everyone to go to college, for example, so they can be lawyers and doctors. But what’s wrong with being a builder or a bus driver or whatever? Why do we undermine the idea of people being successful in their own terms, not in terms of what other people think they should want? Do we reward the wrong thing in our society - power and position, rather than sacrifice and effort?
Peace.