Again: if you criticize waterboarders, you will only create more waterboarding. Why not open a dialogue?
Well, you said you support them in whatever they do. So you think if they do something it must be the right thing to do. Which basically gives them a ticket to do whatever they want.No. I support/trust them. Of course I don't support waterboarding anyone innocent. The demonic terrorists caught in the act are not innocent. We didn't just pick these guys up at the mosque.
That didn't have anything to do with terrorism. Just shows how deluded you are. By the way, we got alot of info from Saddam by treating him well.
But if he "admitted" it under waterboarding, is it admissible?
so you think torture is justified even though it does not produce good results
Useful or not, it's illegal.
(4) of a person who, in relation to an armed conflict and contrary to the provisions of the Protocol on Prohibitions or Restrictions on the Use of Mines, Booby-Traps and Other Devices as amended at Geneva on 3 May 1996 (Protocol II as amended on 3 May 1996), when the United States is a party to such Protocol, willfully kills or causes serious injury to civilians.
A federal anti-torture statute (18 U.S.C. § 2340A), enacted in 1994, provides for the prosecution of a U.S. national or anyone present in the United States who, while outside the U.S., commits or attempts to commit torture. Torture is defined as an “act committed by a person acting under the color of law specifically intended to inflict severe physical or mental pain or suffering (other than pain or suffering incidental to lawful sanctions) upon another person within his custody or physical control.” A person found guilty under the act can be incarcerated for up to 20 years or receive the death penalty if the torture results in the victim’s death.
Nothing new. From a "Christian" nation. Yeah right...
"Torture Is an American Value: Reality vs. the Rhetoric"
(http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article11238.htm)
Rotten to the core ...
"The US has used torture for decades. All that's new is the openness about it"
(http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1664174,00.html)