Chinese Scholar Yang Jian liang Putting Wrongs to Rights in Astrophysics

DaveC426913 said:
Science is about building on top of things known.
If you make up your own facts, and dismiss known facts, you're not doing science, you're doing fantasy.
And for that reason, this will be always be a flight of fancy, not science.
Click to expand...
Yang's theory is the transformation and development of the existing theory， absorb the essence and remove the dregs, based, of course, on known facts.
 
heyuhua said:
You should design an experiment for experimental physicists to do.
Click to expand...
Again you show your ignorance of the scientific process. You are making the claims; it's up to you to provide the evidence. So you should design an experiment for experimental physicists to do.
 
Oh my God, heyuhua. It's been 1060+ posts.

Order of priorities:

1] Figure out how quoting works.
2] Solve the mysteries of the Cosmos.
 
heyuhua said:
It dawned on me that You are ready to bite with your open mouth like bowl
Click to expand...
I see you changed your avatar...

"It dawned on me that You are ready to bite with your open mouth like bowl, but I've already picked up shotgun"
That's interesting, heyuhua. Is that a death threat? Are you aware that death threats are very much against the forum rules? Please explain yourself.
 
I think "shotgun" is probably a reference to a certain kind of alcoholic drink.

So it actually goes, "I already picked up shotgun, but now shotgun empty . . .".
 
arfa brane said:
I think "shotgun" is probably a reference to a certain kind of alcoholic drink.

So it actually goes, "I already picked up shotgun, but now shotgun empty . . .".
Click to expand...
Perhaps, but how much money are you willing to bet that a person struggling this much with the English language would know the English name of that particular cocktail? And why did he then delete his post, as if it contained something that he knew was not-so-smart-to-post. That, and it's clearly not a drink that his avatar is holding up and aiming.

As the greatest scholar of our recent times said: "but also you poop around".:p
 
Well, the prospect that heyuhua might be able to get his hands on a gun isn't a cheerful one, I'll admit.

Putting wrongs to rights, with a shotgun
Pretty soon, everybody got one.

The other aspect is that this thread just hasn't been entertaining in any way.

I am the entertainer.
(yep, I also play piano)
 
arfa brane said:
Well, the prospect that heyuhua might be able to get his hands on a gun isn't a cheerful one, I'll admit.
Click to expand...
Ah well, if I suddenly disappear, you at least know who to blame.:p

arfa brane said:
Putting wrongs to rights, with a shotgun
Pretty soon, everybody got one.

The other aspect is that this thread just hasn't been entertaining in any way.

I am the entertainer.
(yep, I also play piano)
Click to expand...
Ooh, do you take requests? If so, please do DMX's "Right or Wrong".;)
 
heyuhua said:
People who are not at the same level of thinking don't have to convince each other.
Click to expand...
I'd argue it's the other way around: people who are on the same level of thinking don't need to convince each other; people who are not, do.

But it's not "levels of thinking" we're dealing here with. It's levels of knowledge. For example, one of us doesn't know what a galaxy is. There can be no (useful) thinking if one doesn't even know what the words involved mean.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top