Chinese Scholar Yang Jian liang Putting Wrongs to Rights in Astrophysics

DaveC426913 said:
This is just rhetoric.
Prove it.
Show how Yang's theory explains the Bullet Cluster.
Click to expand...
There is no essential difference from other galaxies about the bullet Cluster,. There are a lot of distortions and misunderstandings about the Bullet Cluster's interpretation by the mainstream，and has nothing to do with the so-called dark energy and dark matter..
 
heyuhua said:
please you show how Yang's theory cannot explain the Bullet Cluster
Click to expand...
I said I wont deal with you but your statement is hard to ignore.
The onus of a new theory is to do things better to a large degree so dont expect others to show why it wont work.
That is the same as those fools saying prove thete is not a god..

However I would be interested to have the observations of the bullet cluster explained using the Yang theory but ot is not up to others to do the work for you...
Alex
 
heyuhua said:
The sun is getting brighter and brighter, is not the most basic evidence?
Click to expand...
Yep, it's pretty good evidence that current mainstream theories are correct: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stellar_evolution

But what does this have to do with anything? How is this the evidence I requested?

heyuhua said:
The employee's head is on the head of someone else, isn't it?
Click to expand...
I have no idea what you mean by this?

heyuhua said:
There's no principle to talk to you，
Click to expand...
Well, same to you. You said you had a lot of evidence, but after asking multiple times, you couldn't even link any of it. In order to talk to someone, you need to be communicating. You are not. It's your own fault you cannot talk to me.

heyuhua said:
Your only job is to cover up mainstream mistakes，
Click to expand...
Did I cover up all the evidence you have? No? Well, then link to it!

heyuhua said:
You often treat falsehood as truth,
Click to expand...
Says the person pushing calculation mistakes as the biggest revelation in science.

heyuhua said:
only for getting the reward of your master
Click to expand...
Again, please tell "my master" that I have yet to receive my reward.:frown:
 
heyuhua said:
What is a galaxy? Galaxies are clusters of matter, and the universe is a large galaxy.
Click to expand...
You dont know and dare to discuss cosmology...you dont realise what a fool you make of yourself.
Here you are talking about gallaxy formation and you dont know what they are...you need an education before you can graduate to the high level of fool.
The universe is not a large gallaxy ...get some comics and learn something.

Alex
 
heyuhua said:
What is a galaxy? Galaxies are clusters of matter, and the universe is a large galaxy.
Click to expand...

heyuhua: Here you demonstrate an ignorance of cosmology so profound that a grade school student could wrestle you to the ground with both hands closed and one eye tied behind his back.

I accuse: You have not even read Yang's theory. You can't have read it. With your ignorance, it is impossible for you to understand a theory of cosmology, let alone support it.

You are done.
 
Last edited:
heyuhua said:
What is a galaxy? Galaxies are clusters of matter, and the universe is a large galaxy.
Click to expand...
yes, What is a galaxy? Galaxies are clusters of matter, and the universe is a large galaxy. This is an extension of the concept of galaxies to facilitate the understanding of galaxy expansion, and understanding the whole universe as a large galaxy can deepen your understanding to the nature of the universe. The expansion of the universe is the expansion of galaxies，it's the same everywhere you look. What we see is always insignificant compared to the whole universe. That is to say, the so-called large scope is still small one,
 
Last edited:
NotEinstein said:
The Bullet Cluster isn't a galaxy; it's (shock!) a cluster. You clearly have no idea what you are talking about.:rolleyes:
Click to expand...
You can think of it as a special galaxy, which doesn't cause anything trouble. of course, you can call a a cluster. It's a system of moving luminous matter, and in this sense it's not fundamentally different from other galaxies.
 
DaveC426913 said:
This is rhetoric. It does not make you any less ignorant of cosmology.



No you can't.

For one, a galaxy is, by definition, a gravitationally-bound object. The universe is not.
Click to expand...
NO, The universe is exactly a gravitationally-bound object
 
heyuhua said:
yes, What is a galaxy? Galaxies are clusters of matter, and the universe is a large galaxy. This is an extension of the concept of galaxies to facilitate the understanding of galaxy expansion, and understanding the whole universe as a large galaxy can deepen your understanding to the nature of the universe.
Click to expand...
I'm a cluster of matter; am I a galaxy?

You are redefining the word galaxy, so it loses all connection with what is called a galaxy in mainstream astronomy. You apparently don't know how words works.

heyuhua said:
You can think of it as a special galaxy,
Click to expand...
Not at the moment. A galaxy has a certain type of order (the orbits of the stars line up in a certain way), and the Bullet Cluster doesn't have that. The Bullet Cluster is a pair of galaxies mid/post-collision. It even stated that explicitly in the Wikipedia-link that was posted.

Again, if you call that a "special galaxy", you are redefining words so that they don't correspond with their mainstream usage anymore. You are no longer talking about galaxies.

heyuhua said:
which doesn't cause anything trouble.
Click to expand...
"Confusing communications through misleading definitions" is trouble.

heyuhua said:
of course, you can call a a cluster.
Click to expand...
Yes, because it is one. It's even in its name!

heyuhua said:
It's a system of moving luminous matter, and in this sense it's not fundamentally different from other galaxies.
Click to expand...
Does your redefinition of galaxy demand luminous matter? So a lightbulb would be a galaxy?
 
NotEinstein said:
I'm a cluster of matter; am I a galaxy?

You are redefining the word galaxy, so it loses all connection with what is called a galaxy in mainstream astronomy. You apparently don't know how words works.


Not at the moment. A galaxy has a certain type of order (the orbits of the stars line up in a certain way), and the Bullet Cluster doesn't have that. The Bullet Cluster is a pair of galaxies mid/post-collision. It even stated that explicitly in the Wikipedia-link that was posted.

Again, if you call that a "special galaxy", you are redefining words so that they don't correspond with their mainstream usage anymore. You are no longer talking about galaxies.


"Confusing communications through misleading definitions" is trouble.


Yes, because it is one. It's even in its name!


Does your redefinition of galaxy demand luminous matter? So a lightbulb would be a galaxy?
Click to expand...
You're extremely wrong. what is galaxy?
a galaxy is system that is made up of stars, planets and other dust, and it has different manners to make, such as disklike, ellipsoid, rod-shaped, and so on.，. Small galaxies form large galaxies, large galaxies form larger galaxies, Larger galaxies make up much larger galaxies,,,,,,,,
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top