NotEinstein
Valued Senior Member
I suppose your silence means you can't link me to the evidence you claimed I should already be buried by? Figures.
I've come up with a lot of evidence to bury you, but you're messing with you.I suppose your silence means you can't link me to the evidence you claimed I should already be buried by? Figures.
Once again, no link to these supposed mountains of evidence. I wonder why?I've come up with a lot of evidence to bury you, but you're messing with you.
I don't know what proof you want. Do you want me to prepare bones for you in an egg?Once again, no link to these supposed mountains of evidence. I wonder why?
All that is explained adequately with present theories and models, as you have been constantly told.Yang's theory not only naturally explains all the observed phenomena, but there are a lot of predictions such as an increase of 9 meters a year in the distance between the sun and the earth,and the radius of the earth increases by 0.5 mm a year, 400 million years ago, the atmospheric pressure was half what it is today,400 million years ago, the Earth's average temperature was - 40 degrees,and the sun is only 1/10 as bright as it is today
Bullshit. Theories are only extended on or improved as further observations are verified by professional scientists. Newtonian is still correct within its zone of applicability....GR is correct within its zones of applicability and gives the same answers as Newtonian albeit far more accurately.You can't stop the progress of science. The mainstream must be replaced by the non-mainstream. In the field of astrophysics, only Yang's theory is the most advanced.
It's not terrible to make a mistake. The terrible thing is not to admit it.All that is explained adequately with present theories and models, as you have been constantly told.
Plus also as others have continually told you, your own nonsensical claims are not what Yang is claiming.
Bullshit. Theories are only extended on or improved as further observations are verified by professional scientists. Newtonian is still correct within its zone of applicability....GR is correct within its zones of applicability and gives the same answers as Newtonian albeit far more accurately.
GR may one day be extended upon with a QGT, but that will be by a professional which you aint, and which Yang has obviously failed in achieving.
Don't believe me? Check out the science media departments of any science academia tomorrow morning, or next week, or next year, or a decade or more from now. GR and the BB will still be holding pride of place, while Yang's theories will simply gather dust and fade into obscurity...your pseudoscience claims will never see the light of day beyond this limited forum.
It's not terrible to make a mistake. The terrible thing is not to admit it.All that is explained adequately with present theories and models, as you have been constantly told.
Plus also as others have continually told you, your own nonsensical claims are not what Yang is claiming.
Bullshit. Theories are only extended on or improved as further observations are verified by professional scientists. Newtonian is still correct within its zone of applicability....GR is correct within its zones of applicability and gives the same answers as Newtonian albeit far more accurately.
GR may one day be extended upon with a QGT, but that will be by a professional which you aint, and which Yang has obviously failed in achieving.
Don't believe me? Check out the science media departments of any science academia tomorrow morning, or next week, or next year, or a decade or more from now. GR and the BB will still be holding pride of place, while Yang's theories will simply gather dust and fade into obscurity...your pseudoscience claims will never see the light of day beyond this limited forum.
And that's why you continue to ignore the evidence that you are wrong, and continue to make paranoid claims re anyone that dare show your posts for the ignorance that they are, as out to get you and a hired person by vested interests. Desperate people though will resort to anything. Like I said, your hypothetical nonsense will be lost forever in cyber space, unless of course you decide to publish them in a children's Library as fairy tales.It's not terrible to make a mistake. The terrible thing is not to admit it.
How about a link to all that evidence you claim you posted before?I don't know what proof you want. Do you want me to prepare bones for you in an egg?
Exactly. So what does that say about the person in this thread who repeatedly proved their own derivations to be wrong by a factor 2, but failed to admit that even when it was pointed out explicitly?It's not terrible to make a mistake. The terrible thing is not to admit it.
The sun is getting brighter and brighter, is not the most basic evidence?How about a link to all that evidence you claim you posted before?
So you've said.Yang's theory not only naturally explains all the observed phenomena,
Another place where you are unaware of the facts."DM is mass present, where we don't see anything massive."
You're extremely wrong. You can't see something somewhere, maybe it's because the temperature is low and it's not luminous, which doesn't prove there's no ordinary matter here.
Excellent. This demonstrates that you haven't done the slightest bit of reading about DM.For example, in the dark, you can't see a house one meter away, you can't say it doesn't exist. A lot of matter is not seen by ordinary telescopes, but they can be seen by radio telescopes. That is to say, the fact that you can't see something somewhere, maybe it's because observational technology doesn't make it, doesn't mean there must be dark matter there.We can't see the air. but you can't say that air is dark matter. Anyway, dark matter is ridiculous,in Yang's theory, it's superfluous. In galaxy this negative pressure completely replaces dark matter, no need of introducing dark matter
Is it against Yang's theory?So you've said.
Show how it explains the Bullet Cluster.
Another place where you are unaware of the facts.
Also another place where you make up your own ideas instead of referring to Yang's theory.
Excellent. This demonstrates that you haven't doe the slightest bit of research into DM.
Which means, when you say Yang's theory explains it, you actually have no idea.
Have you actually studies Yang's theory? Because it does not say what you think it says.
Perfect. So you have demonstrably asserted something that you do not know is true.Is it against Yang's theory?