Regarding the 20 questions; one major problem is that these type of programs update their data according to the users that interact with them.
So if you were to make up an imaginary object it would mess up the data. Similarly if you think of a chimpanzee and say it is a mineral which refracts light, cleans easily, and is man-made (or, less idiotically simply are misinformed about one of the questions and answer "yes" to a question which is factually a "no" for your object) the system is similarly messed up.
...while typing this I was randomly answering further questions about my imaginary "Mineral" and was asked if it was carnivorous.
[edit]
Sorry for the repeated postings and edits, but this was also very amusing. here are my 20 question results (I didn't answer the final question as to avoid any further corruption of the system)
1. It is classified as Mineral.
2. Does it refract light? Yes.
3. Do you clean it regularly? Usually.
4. Is it man made? Yes.
5. Can it fit in an envelope? Yes.
6. Is it a metal? Yes.
7. Is it a common household object? No.
8. Is it yellow? Yes.
9. Is it heavy? Sometimes.
10. Is it a geological feature? Maybe.
11. Is it part of a set? Usually.
12. Is it formed from carbon? Depends.
13. Does it come from something larger? Sometimes.
14. Does it have a hard outer shell? Yes.
15. Can you use it as money? Yes.
16. Do you make something with it? Partly.
17. Is it useful? Doubtful.
18. Is it involved in movies? Yes.
19. Is it a carnivore? Yes.
20. I guess that it is everything? No.
21. Is it organic? Yes.
22. Is it an abstract concept? No.
23. Is it a reptile? No.
24. Does it require specific knowledge to use it? No.
25. Can you put something into it? Depends.
26. Is it multicolored? Usually.
27. Is it made of crystals? Yes.
28. Does a hockey player use it? Yes.
I am guessing that it is a human head?
hehehe. yes. yes it is.
[/edit]