Can nanobot’s be strong enough to produce fusion.

Status
Not open for further replies.
B

Blindman

Valued Senior Member
Could we produce a nanobot that could push two atoms together till they fuse??

I imagine a simple nanobot with two arms which would collect the two atoms and simply push them together. Is it possible for the molecular arms to have the strength needed to do the job? or would the molecular bonds in the arms just break apart with the forces involved?

You could make a nice nanobomb. Get a large bucket full of these bots to do it at the same time and bang.
 
Yes, you can do some studying on nanotechnology, scientists can already push together millions of molocules from say; air, water, and soil to create potatoes, and what nots.
 
what IS it with you and the scientists creating potatos? PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE show me an article or journal or SOMETHING that talks about nanotechnology as it relates to potatos!

-AntonK

To The Mods: If I seem rude, I appologize, but I asked him a similar question in another thread and he did not answer, I just want to know.
 
Could we produce a nanobot that could push two atoms together till they fuse??
Click to expand...

IMHO, no. Fussion among the common susable elements, assuming your method is to create a power source, requires a high initial kenetic energy. For instance, to initiate a deuterium-deuterium fusion reaction, you need an initial kenetic energy of about .25 MeV, which is like two billion kelvins, a pretty hot temperature. I don't think your nano-bots could get the kinetic energy of molecules up to this level.

I imagine a simple nanobot with two arms which would collect the two atoms and simply push them together. Is it possible for the molecular arms to have the strength needed to do the job? or would the molecular bonds in the arms just break apart with the forces involved?
Click to expand...

Basically fusion occurs when two atoms get close enough together that their strong force overcomes their electric repulsivity. As mentioned above, you need a large kenetic force to do so, their not going to naturally overcome their electric repulsion. The only real method to do this, is to excite them to a high enough temperature, for temperature is the average kenetic energy of a substance. I think you;d need more sudies to determine if im right or not, but i don't think your arms would hold up.

You could make a nice nanobomb. Get a large bucket full of these bots to do it at the same time and bang.
Click to expand...

Would you like a glass of water Mr. President?

Your nanobot is also made of atoms, as are you.
Click to expand...
Could you please elaborate what your trying to say? This really has no point, we know we're made of atoms, how does this statement contribute?

Yes, you can do some studying on nanotechnology
Click to expand...

duh? i don't think the point of his post was to ask if he should study about nanotechnology, i think it was to assess the possibilty of nanorobotics in cold fusion.

scientists can already push together millions of molocules from say; air, water, and soil to create potatoes, and what nots.
Click to expand...

Whats your source for this information? This sounds like on Star Trek, where they ask the "replicator" to make them a steak, i think your getting sci-fi mixed up with reality there buddy
 
You have to push the protons, not the atoms.

It isn't just pushing the atoms together that causes a fusion reaction, if you're analyzing it at this level of magnification. You can push two atoms at each other all day and all you'll get (depending on what kind of atoms and whether they're the same or different kinds) is perhaps a covalent bond among the electrons.

It's the elementary particles in the nuclei which need to be put in close proximity to cause fusion. And at the scale of subatomic particles, you're talking, what, maybe ten to the minus 6 smaller than that of the atoms themselves. (Just a guess. Any physicists here?) You'll need a picobot or a femtobot or a yattobot, or whatever the next prefix is, to be able to manipulate particles at that scale.

And the problem is that the bot won't be much bigger than the particles it's trying to manipulate. Don't ask me how it will be constructed so that it has "hands" and "wheels" at a subatomic scale. It begs the question of discovering and using particles smaller than protons and neutrons to build a machine that can manipulate protons and neutrons!

Also, it will require tremendous energy to push those nuclei together. The input energy to a nuclear reaction is not trivial, considering the size of the output! How is the little machine going to be able to channel that much energy through its small body, yet maintain enough precision to be able to manually push the nuclei together by sheer brute force?

When it comes to science I'm an optimist, and I assume the answer to a question like yours is always Yes, if we just wait long enough. But the nanotechnology we have now, and the future nanotechnology we can extrapolate from what we've got and where we're going, isn't nearly small enough, precise enough, and strong enough to push two protons together.

So yes, we might manage to build a machine that can push two atoms of hydrogen and one atom of oxygen together and custom-build a single molecule of water as a science project. But that ability falls far short of what is required to cause a fusion reaction.

Now, maybe if the Home Shopping channel could sell him a little tiny Dremel, he could use it to break a nucleus apart and cause a fission reaction!
 
Thanks to Fafnir665.

I think I’m talking about COLD FUSION.

you need an initial kenetic energy of about .25 MeV
Click to expand...

Can the needed kinetic energy be reduce by increasing the pressure ? A molecule could be made to collapse on its self creating areas of very high pressure.

It was Archimedes who said, "Give me a lever long enough and a fulcrum on which to
place it, and I shall move the world." Or blindman says “...fuse the atom”.

I believe that the repulsive force that must be over come to fuse two atoms is higher for larger atoms. Thus large atoms could be used to push small atoms together till they overcome the repulsion.


Something I learnt about nanobots in the last day.
Nanobots are much larger the atoms. Nanobot is just a term for man made molecules. Nanobots work via chemical reactions, adding just one atom to one part of the nanobot and the structure of the entire nanobot could change.
 
Originally posted by Blindman


I believe that the repulsive force that must be over come to fuse two atoms is higher for larger atoms. Thus large atoms could be used to push small atoms together till they overcome the repulsion.
Click to expand...


.25MeV is for an isotope of hydrogen
 
Fortunately, we are surrounded and inspired by products that are marvelously complex and yet very inexpensive. Potatoes, for example, are made by intricate molecular machines involving tens of thousands of genes, proteins, and other molecular components; yet the result costs so little that we think nothing of mashing this biological wonder and eating it.

It's easy to see why potatoes and other agricultural products are so cheap: put a potato in a little moist dirt, provide it with some air and sunlight, and we get more potatoes. In short, potatoes are self replicating.
Click to expand...

umm, this is refering to the natural process of potatos growing, not them being produce by machines
 
You could get your nanobots to re-arrange the molecular compositions of materials to make an extremely powerful bomb. Like re-arranging a potato's atoms to something like that of nitro glycerin. lol. :m:
 
"Pressure" only has meaning with molecules.

Originally posted by Blindman
Can the needed kinetic energy be reduced by increasing the pressure? A molecule could be made to collapse on itself creating areas of very high pressure.
Click to expand...
Pressure is a variable that only makes sense at a macro level. It is a manifestation of the speed of motion of molecules and the distance between them. Fusion reactions occur at the level of subatomic particles, way, way past the point of being able to observe phenomena involving molecules.
 
I guess nanobots won't be able to create fusion by grabbing two atoms and pusing them one against the other ... but maybe we could build nanobots that have little magnetic traps and little accelerators and basically be a miniature powerplant ... but even this is going to be a very difficult task
 
Why nanobots?

We might be able to build extremely small nuclear fusion reactors that work in the conventional way, by using foreseeable technology to simply miniaturize the existing equipment. I don't know whether there is an economy of scale involved in the shielding, unfortunately. If it takes the same amount of shielding to protect us from the radiation of a powerplant just large enough to power a home or an automobile as one large enough to power a city, then my idea won't work.

Barring that complication, there are probably several ways to approach the problem of building small nuclear reactors. Is there a reason you think it should be done with nanobots? If you have a tiny enough conventional reactor, you could just use the nanobots to sit in the tiny control room and manipulate the tiny controls. Does that count?
 
Pressure must apply.. As I understand it fusion occurs in various situations as a function of pressure and temperature (kinetic energy). Inside the sun the fusion reaction occurs at a much lower temperature then is required on earth.

If two atoms are forced into each other by say magnetic fields. The atoms would have no kinetic energy (not moving) yet they would still be pushing against each other, is that not pressure.

Well I think there is much for me to learn.

I think nanobots are suited to the job because they would be cheap and easy to produce. I would imagine the bots being place inside a battery type device supplying power from the fusion release of energy.
 
Macro vs. micro level models of the universe

Originally posted by Blindman
Pressure must apply.. As I understand it fusion occurs in various situations as a function of pressure and temperature (kinetic energy). Inside the sun the fusion reaction occurs at a much lower temperature then is required on earth.
Click to expand...
That is true. But remember that what we are always talking about is a model of the universe, not the universe itself. A discussion of the temperature and pressure inside the sun, which is, I guess (um, any physicists here?), on the order of magnitude of hundreds of thousands of kilometers in diameter, is a discussion at the macro level. Therefore, using the same model that we use to discuss the way our senses experience the universe is satisfactory. Temperature, pressure, all of those variables give us a model of the sun that is consistent with our observations and the rest of our macrophysics.
If two atoms are forced into each other by say magnetic fields, the atoms would have no kinetic energy (not moving) yet they would still be pushing against each other. Is that not pressure?
Click to expand...
Now your discussion has zoomed in from a scale measured in thousands of kilometers to one measured in Angstroms. What is that, about twenty orders of magnitude? (Still waiting for a real physicist to log in!)

Pressure and temperature are macro-level variables parameterized by the average rate of speed of the molecules inside a given volume and the average distance between them. You can't use this model at the micro level to talk about two specific molecules in that space. The law of averages says you might, at random, have stumbled on to two of them that just stopped moving and are three molecular diameters apart. At a macro level the temperature and pressure inside a volume of gas is the same at every point (assuming you didn't just start a reaction which is radiating outward from one of those points). At a micro level you just can't talk about the temperature or pressure of the tiny stretch of empty space between two molecules. The concept is invalid; wrong model. If there are no particles in that particular spot, there is no way to measure its temperature or pressure. It is just as invalid to talk about the temperature or pressure of an indiviudal molecule, since its velocity and distance from other molecules changes constantly, and, from our point of view, at random.

But you're zooming in many orders of magnitude even beyond the molecular level, to the level of the atom or to the level of the elementary particles that comprise its nucleus and populate its electron orbits. The human-senses model of the universe really doesn't work at that level. When you talk about "pushing" two atoms together, it's analogous to "pushing" two solar systems together. What are the odds that one of the planets of one system will just happen to collide with one of the planets of the other system? Can you push them with enough precision to cause their suns to collide?

And even this analogy breaks down at this point. The suns exert gravity forces on each other, so if you're pushing slowly enough and manage to get the suns close enough, they will pull themselves together. Atomic nuclei are just the opposite, since they are composed entirely of protons and (in most cases) neutrons. They all have a positive charge. If you manage to bring two nuclei close enough together for them to respond to the proximity, their response will be to repel each other rather than draw closer together.
I think nanobots are suited to the job because they would be cheap and easy to produce. I would imagine the bots being place inside a battery type device supplying power from the fusion release of energy.
Click to expand...
As I said, nanobots may have some role in such a device. Certainly nano- or picotechnology in general will. However, I'm still waiting for a physicist to log in and set us straight on the issue of shielding. I have no idea how much lethal radiation these tiny reactors will produce and how many grams or kilograms of shielding we will need to protect ourselves from the nuclear power supplies in our cell phones and wristwatches.
 
Can you push them with enough precision to cause their suns to collide???
Click to expand...
That’s what the point is. I know that pushing atoms together is like squeezing a bar of soap. But squeeze it just right. That’s what the nanobots might be able to do.
I have no idea how much lethal radiation these tiny reactors will produce
Click to expand...
The nanobots would use the energy to produce electricity and set up the next fusion event. These devices should radiate almost nothing.

It would be interesting to know how many nanobots working at one fusion event every 100th of a second would be required to produce the same power as a 1.5volt battery..
 
Entropy!

Originally posted by Blindman
The nanobots would use the energy [deadly waste radiation] to produce electricity and set up the next fusion event. These devices should radiate almost nothing.
Click to expand...
Um, are we perhaps forgetting about entropy here?
 
Man… What a mind fuck…. Oppps sorry about the language.
What…entropy is the state of the universe…..
Does the sun forget entropy… We live in a grainy universe there are many sources of energy..
The nanobot cold fusion system would not break the laws of entropy.

We would be exploiting the imbalance that exists in nature as a result of creation. The universe is not smooth..

You will have to explain…
 
It's difficult to harness the waste energy of a nuclear reactor. Radioactivity is not a form of energy that we have learned to change into a more useful form. It is pretty near the bottom of the energy "food chain", sort of a "you are this close to entropy" milepost. I have strong doubts that the idea is practical. My instincts tell me that shielding will be the only answer and, therefore, we'll still have the problem of finding a place to dump little tiny lumps of radioactive waste.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top