like the dogs that they are.
How very enlightened of you.
like the dogs that they are.
Baron Max said:
And isn't it ironic that President Bush was the very person who gave that person the freedom and the rights to throw that shoe?
Apparently iraqi preferred to live under the draconian fists of saddam then the present everyone-killing-each-other fuckupistan that is iraqi now. I don't get it America has killed more Iraqis then Saddam and has destroyed a country that was at least functional and made so by a curl secular dictator, but we brought freedom which should have made it totally worth it.
Baron Max
do you really believe that guy would have thrown a shoe at saddam?
you already know why he wouldn't sam.Why would he?
still doesn't answer the question of whether that guy would've thrown a shoe at saddam does it?If you examine the history of your country, you should start wondering why other countries do not have this extreme reactions to other countries until the US steps in. Saddam was very popular for 15 of his 25 years. In the US.
1. Shouldn't you have jumped in front of that shoe?
2. Shouldn't you have jumped in front of that second shoe?
3. Second shoe = the one thrown after being removed from foot after first shoe was thrown.
4. Let's say people had three feet. Would you have allowed a third shoe to fly unimpeded?
5. While the shoe was in the air, were you like, "Oh, its just a shoe."
6. Same question about the second shoe.
7. Do you think this is funny, "Throw a shoe at me once, shame on--you. Throw a shoe--you throw a shoe, you can't throw a shoe again."
8. Is there not "protection training" for lunatics launching objects?
9. Let's say there isn't training for that--but do they tell you that if someone does throw (or shoot) something to be on the alert in case they want to repeat this behavior?
10. Where were you?
(Friedman)