It is nearly meaningless to set any universal fixed "poverty threshold" in dollar terms. You can make absolute definitions by comparison to some other absolutes, like how many times will your income provide the food calories you need to live, etc. Normally poverty is defined WITHIN YOUR SOCIETY as some less than unity fraction of the average income, as I explain a few post back to Jeff:Sure, and poverty in China is defined by the World Bank as living on less $1.25 per day. So comparing this to poverty in the US is not viable.
... You will note that I said "poverty" by their national standards." "Poverty" is always a relative concept and for good reason - If you only have ~15% of the average income, your feel poor. If it were an absolute standard at the current level most of the US was in poverty circa 1900. About two decades ago, the US poverty level was an income higher than the average in Canada.
I agree they are very afraid of Tiananmen Square events or the recent Nobel peace prise. They have a very long way to go when it comes to free political speech (or even a reasonably sensored internet.)The Chinese government found out what 'the people' want in Tiananmen Square, and it terrifies them. They realize the importance of keeping the masses at the margins of existence, politically powerless, but nevertheless a powerhouse of production for the government's military ambitions.
The vast majority of the Chinese people are very happy with the CCP rule as it has delivered them from periodic hunger to buyers of cell phones, etc. - there are far more internet users in China than there are Americans! As I said in prior post most (>90%) of Chinese are more concerned with a full belly that complete freedom government policy as they remember well when they had neither.
Quite the contrary to your suggestion that the CCP is "keeping the masses at the margins of existence," the CCP understands that they are in danger of losing power if the average Chinese does not find his material living standards rapidly advancing. In fact that it is, is the only reason the Chinese people willing accept the suppression of their liberates.
That fear of the CCP that they will have revolution if they do not rapidly improve the living standards of the average Chinese (read that as in the interior) is why most of their stimulus (larger compared to their GDP than the US's stimulus) is directed towards building 100 new cities in the interior, rapid expansion of the railroads in the interior, new hospitals and clinics in the interior, etc. I.e. good paying (by Chinese standards) jobs are being created in the interior and this has essentially stopped the migration (about 1 million /per month only two years ago) to work in the coastal city factories. That is why those factories now have sever labor shortage and are increasing REAL purchasing power wages between 20 and 30% per year.
SUMMARY:Material living standards are very rapidly improving in both the coastal cities and for first time ever, in the interior. Not because the CCP is greatly concerned for the people, but because they are concerned they may lose their grip on power if even just US style stagnation comes to China. The Chinese people now expect their government to give them a much, much better life than their parents had.
Recent surveys show that the youth of American do not expect to live as well as their parents did and they are correct. -They won't as they inherit a huge government debt.($44,025.51 each today and rapidly growing)
Last edited by a moderator: