(I was in a quandary whether to post this in the physics section. I have only done so, because it reflects on our ability to see consciousness as somehow breaking free from normal quantum events, so it deemed a relevant quantum discussion, in my eyes.)
The Entropy of Consciousness Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics: And
Investigating the Laws of a True Story
My mentor, Dr Wolf, showed me an insight that consciousness can gain or lose entropy of knowledge. There are ways to explain this, but I find this next way the best, and the best in the sense it agrees well with the spacetime theory as a whole.
Consider the entropy of knowledge. We go through the day, gaining knowledge, loosing it, and regaining it again. But we eventually go to sleep, wake up, and it’s as if what we have learned has gone back to the very beginning, where we have to reprocess these memories of experience and knowledge.
Why? Proof?
Well, I might have some idea’s that would help prove this from a metaphysical side of things. Some of you may be saying, in conclusion to my premise
‘’Consider the entropy of knowledge. We go through the day, gaining knowledge, loosing it, and regaining it again. But we eventually go to sleep, wake up, and it’s as if what we have learned, has gone back to the very beginning, where we have to reprocess these memories of experience and knowledge.’’
That it cannot be right at all, because we can continue from a thought not necessarily from the beginning. For instance, in relative to our experiences, we can indeed wake up, and start thinking about a theory we left in our heads and start to conclude about what was being initially thought of… however, a strange process is also involved, which I am going to add.
1) You cannot wake up in the morning, know where you ended without some reflection on how you came to that premise…
Knowledge is derived from knowing that there has been a beginning and an end – in other words, like any true story that agrees well with us to how something has turned out, then we have mentally noted a beginning of something, like a measurement, and the end, the knowledge we come to have from that measurement.
Suppose this very process happens two times, i.e. you read a word, then we process it as a memory/knowledge… then another word, so we can say,
The
Simple
You had to in fact measure the word ‘’The’’, then once that has a beginning and end, your knowledge of ‘’The’’ follows into ‘’Simple,’’ where you measure that word, and the result is knowledge of that word. But since we have measured a word before that, the word ‘’Simple’’ has an added detail of ‘’The’’… So this is ‘’entropy of knowledge’’ as I have come to call it, and have many before me.
But some interesting things follow from this. Our psyche of consciousness and role of subconsciousness, actually take on complimentary roles. A part of our subconsciousness ‘’holds onto’’ the original word we come to process, as we move into the secondary word. Somehow, ‘’The Simple,’’ isn’t enough for understanding, at the subconscious level. Instead, subconsciously, we also process it as backward, ‘’Simple The.’’
Strange? Perhaps, but stop and think about it for a second. We are conscious of one process of gaining knowledge, and yet, even though ‘’The’’ has its own measurement and gaining of knowledge, a beginning and start, the string of words ‘’The Simple,’’ also has it’s beginning and end, and for that to be even possible, there must be a mechanism where subconsciously we reflect on ‘’the negative time direction of knowledge’’ which would be, ‘’Simple The.’’
So in a sense, it is hard to distinguish the beginning as the end, or the end as the beginning, if there can be a distinguishing factor at all. (2) But we can loose knowledge of these words, and in contrast, in the external world, it’s very different, because entropy is the second law of thermodynamics, and shouldn’t be broken very simply, so whilst things continue to displace and continue to get chaotic ‘’out there in the material world,’’ sometimes information ‘’in here can go back to the way they where’’. The Mind has an amazing ability to break free from the laws of physics… Take the uncertainty principle. It was physicist David Albert who first recognized that consciousness breaks the uncertainty principle, because unlike a particles obeying quantum uncertainty when an observer is involved, we know where we are going, and we know where we are.
(2) – The point being made here, is also deeper. There is overwhelming proof that for a finite past to exist, there must be a finite future, if anything is to exist in between. In a bigger cosmic sense, this must also mean the universe must have an Omega Point.
It might be, that consciousness itself breaks every rule in the quantum rulebook. In fact, I would challenge that the mind can only do these things, because the rules themselves of physics cannot apply to our perception of consciousness, but that does not mean that consciousness itself does not depend on actual quantum actions for it to exist, because in my opinion, to consider such a thing, is ridiculous at best. It only through quantum actions, can molecules even exist.
The Entropy of Consciousness Violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics: And
Investigating the Laws of a True Story
My mentor, Dr Wolf, showed me an insight that consciousness can gain or lose entropy of knowledge. There are ways to explain this, but I find this next way the best, and the best in the sense it agrees well with the spacetime theory as a whole.
Consider the entropy of knowledge. We go through the day, gaining knowledge, loosing it, and regaining it again. But we eventually go to sleep, wake up, and it’s as if what we have learned has gone back to the very beginning, where we have to reprocess these memories of experience and knowledge.
Why? Proof?
Well, I might have some idea’s that would help prove this from a metaphysical side of things. Some of you may be saying, in conclusion to my premise
‘’Consider the entropy of knowledge. We go through the day, gaining knowledge, loosing it, and regaining it again. But we eventually go to sleep, wake up, and it’s as if what we have learned, has gone back to the very beginning, where we have to reprocess these memories of experience and knowledge.’’
That it cannot be right at all, because we can continue from a thought not necessarily from the beginning. For instance, in relative to our experiences, we can indeed wake up, and start thinking about a theory we left in our heads and start to conclude about what was being initially thought of… however, a strange process is also involved, which I am going to add.
1) You cannot wake up in the morning, know where you ended without some reflection on how you came to that premise…
Knowledge is derived from knowing that there has been a beginning and an end – in other words, like any true story that agrees well with us to how something has turned out, then we have mentally noted a beginning of something, like a measurement, and the end, the knowledge we come to have from that measurement.
Suppose this very process happens two times, i.e. you read a word, then we process it as a memory/knowledge… then another word, so we can say,
The
Simple
You had to in fact measure the word ‘’The’’, then once that has a beginning and end, your knowledge of ‘’The’’ follows into ‘’Simple,’’ where you measure that word, and the result is knowledge of that word. But since we have measured a word before that, the word ‘’Simple’’ has an added detail of ‘’The’’… So this is ‘’entropy of knowledge’’ as I have come to call it, and have many before me.
But some interesting things follow from this. Our psyche of consciousness and role of subconsciousness, actually take on complimentary roles. A part of our subconsciousness ‘’holds onto’’ the original word we come to process, as we move into the secondary word. Somehow, ‘’The Simple,’’ isn’t enough for understanding, at the subconscious level. Instead, subconsciously, we also process it as backward, ‘’Simple The.’’
Strange? Perhaps, but stop and think about it for a second. We are conscious of one process of gaining knowledge, and yet, even though ‘’The’’ has its own measurement and gaining of knowledge, a beginning and start, the string of words ‘’The Simple,’’ also has it’s beginning and end, and for that to be even possible, there must be a mechanism where subconsciously we reflect on ‘’the negative time direction of knowledge’’ which would be, ‘’Simple The.’’
So in a sense, it is hard to distinguish the beginning as the end, or the end as the beginning, if there can be a distinguishing factor at all. (2) But we can loose knowledge of these words, and in contrast, in the external world, it’s very different, because entropy is the second law of thermodynamics, and shouldn’t be broken very simply, so whilst things continue to displace and continue to get chaotic ‘’out there in the material world,’’ sometimes information ‘’in here can go back to the way they where’’. The Mind has an amazing ability to break free from the laws of physics… Take the uncertainty principle. It was physicist David Albert who first recognized that consciousness breaks the uncertainty principle, because unlike a particles obeying quantum uncertainty when an observer is involved, we know where we are going, and we know where we are.
(2) – The point being made here, is also deeper. There is overwhelming proof that for a finite past to exist, there must be a finite future, if anything is to exist in between. In a bigger cosmic sense, this must also mean the universe must have an Omega Point.
It might be, that consciousness itself breaks every rule in the quantum rulebook. In fact, I would challenge that the mind can only do these things, because the rules themselves of physics cannot apply to our perception of consciousness, but that does not mean that consciousness itself does not depend on actual quantum actions for it to exist, because in my opinion, to consider such a thing, is ridiculous at best. It only through quantum actions, can molecules even exist.