I had a tute today in mental health about Aborigional cultures specifically and cultures in general. As part of this we had a senario where a girl whos brother had recently died was seeing him walking around the house and doing things ect. The question was "is she psycotic?"
Now we had a lecture on the ways Aborigionals express grief including actually seeing the decseased as part of the grieving and if they have neglected there duties to that person or the tribe.
Anyway i said no she is not psycotic because this is the cultural way she expresses grief and the rest of my group said yes she is psycotic because she is hallucinating.
Well i brought up imaginary friends that children have and they dismissed that so i through in christan religion. Ie its a delusion to belive that a god who cant be seen or herd is really there.
I got blasted for being insensitive and i turned to the girl and said but your doing the same thing to the girl in the senario, ie your dismissing her cultural beliefs in favor of your own.
Why is it so hard specifically for religious people to understand that just because something is expressed differently (ie as actually seeing rather than "feeling") that its just as valid as there OWN beliefs?
Now we had a lecture on the ways Aborigionals express grief including actually seeing the decseased as part of the grieving and if they have neglected there duties to that person or the tribe.
Anyway i said no she is not psycotic because this is the cultural way she expresses grief and the rest of my group said yes she is psycotic because she is hallucinating.
Well i brought up imaginary friends that children have and they dismissed that so i through in christan religion. Ie its a delusion to belive that a god who cant be seen or herd is really there.
I got blasted for being insensitive and i turned to the girl and said but your doing the same thing to the girl in the senario, ie your dismissing her cultural beliefs in favor of your own.
Why is it so hard specifically for religious people to understand that just because something is expressed differently (ie as actually seeing rather than "feeling") that its just as valid as there OWN beliefs?