I wonder what type of gun he uses for fishing.
Big bang clarification?
- Thread starter theorist-constant12345
- Start date
Catching trout with a shotgun is easy in comparison to hunting deer with a fishing rod in my experience.
Bin the thread I am no longer allowed to speak to you, I am not allowed to think about the science I have learnt, I have been forced into just saying YOU ARE CORRECT, it is I who can not read what the definition of Psuedo science is.
You are correct in everything science says.
You are are correct in your forced disciplines, you justify your ''Sharia laws''.
I am just a servant , I must obey.
46 points, some for trolling, you have not even seen a troll yet, so be it I will become a real troll.
You are correct in everything science says.
You are are correct in your forced disciplines, you justify your ''Sharia laws''.
I am just a servant , I must obey.
46 points, some for trolling, you have not even seen a troll yet, so be it I will become a real troll.
That should be remarkably easy for you since you haven't learned any science.
And then join a different science forum so you can whine about being banned unjustly?
Not bothered now dy, I learnt everything I was taught, my threads have all your input teaching science and showing people about bad theory.
I am smart,
Demonstrably untrue.
Any input you had from others was mangled, filtered through your prejudiced ignorance and twisted into unrecognisability.
Also demonstrably untrue.
And who as ever asked me demonstrate present information?
You won Dy, your forum helpers won, you set out to remove me from the forum and achieved your goals.
I wish you good luck in the future, I know it is a game to you and your forum friends, well played,
Last edited:
What?
You have PERSISTENTLY made claims about what "present information" says - and been wrong.
You have PERSISTENTLY misunderstood what you have been told, even when it's been pointed out that you're wrong.
no I have not, it is all of you's redefining the definition of Psuedo, not me, I use the correct use of psuedo, psuedo is free thought.
Please feel free to ask me about present information , what would you like to know?
Try learning to read.
You have PERSISTENTLY made claims about what "present information" says - and been wrong.
You have PERSISTENTLY misunderstood what you have been told, even when it's been pointed out that you're wrong.
I didn't say anything about "Pseudo": you haven't learned any science.
There's NOTHING I would ask you about science.
There's NOTHING that you could teach me about science.
and like normal you avoid what i said.
There's NOTHING I would ask you about science.
so arrogant
so arrogant
Nope.
Simply a recognition that I have had an education in, and actually practised, science.
Whereas you learned nothing and prefer to just make shit up.
Although I do find it somewhat ironic that the guy who claims that all of science is wrong while he's right is calling me arrogant.
I nearly covered my keyboard with coffee over that one.
i learnt nothing, yea ok, try me .
I don't need to.
You have shown that you've learned nothing in nearly every post you made.
Practically every single statement or claim that you made about what science says has been wrong.
following psuedo definition to the letter
Do you really think that when on other forums and you and others gave me explanation etc, that I simply forgot it all?
You might not have forgotten it all, but did you actually learn anything when it was explained to you how and why you were wrong?
You're doing it again: replying to something I didn't say.
That's not what I said.
You didn't "forget" it - you simply didn't understand it, failed utterly to learn it and then spouted it back in a form that was so mangled as to be non-science.
Oh, just notice you got banned while I replied.
Goodbye and good riddance.