Ban Billy T pole

Ban Billy T - as arrogant and disrespectful

  • Yes, ban Billy

    Votes: 8 30.8%
  • No, just warn Billy

    Votes: 1 3.8%
  • No

    Votes: 6 23.1%
  • Billy who? & I don't care.

    Votes: 11 42.3%

  • Total voters
    26
  • Poll closed .

Billy T

Use Sugar Cane Alcohol car Fuel
Valued Senior Member
In view of his arrogance and disrespect for moderators and other authority, including US Congress, the President, most company CEOs, and several unnamed posters here,

Billy T should be banded.

If you do not know about this disrespect, see:

For spidergoat:

http://www.sciforums.com/showpost.php?p=1250000&postcount=113

Or disrespect of James R. at:

http://www.sciforums.com/showpost.php?p=1247761&postcount=6

For GWB there are dozens of examples, but one of the latest is:

http://www.sciforums.com/showpost.php?p=1248608&postcount=13

You get the point. - BBB (Better Ban Billy)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
As more evidence of his arrogance and disrepect - he placed this pole in World Events! Ban him now.
 
It must be an end-of-year thing. Even our normal, sane posters are losing the plot now.

Anyway, I voted to ban you. What the hell.
 
Furthermore, he thinks POLL is spelled pole - stupid as well. Ban him now.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ban him! because a. who the fuck is he? b. why is he so vain as to desire that he will be concluded indispensable? and c. I want my mum!
 
Hell I can think of a lot of other people who should be banned for far worse post and disrespect of their fellow Sci Forum posters than Bill T Poll.
 
Hell, I don't think Billy T should be banned! In fact, we should force him to come here every day and read all of the posts .....and suffer right along with the rest of us! :D

Baron Max
 
Im guessing this is a joke-nevertheless i voted no.
You voted No ?? Note I see your posts now - yes my ignore list is empty again. BTW Happy New Year to you and all. - Thought I ought to say that before the Mods, pull the level and let me swing too.

No wait -Just checked the poll again: 6 for banning and 7 not voting that way - perhaps you and others will be stuck with me in 2007 too. :D

Sciforums is a democracy you know. :rolleyes:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top