Bah Bah Black Sheep

Status
Not open for further replies.
Its mostly because all the white guilt does not stop them from continuing to loot the people from other cultures

What looting?

at the same time as they whine about maintaining the homogeneity of their own.

Christ, we need a hell of a lot more whiners then.

See any racists boycotting stuff that comes from other countries? Boycott corporations and goods that use foreign or immigrant labor? Any of them willing to replace the immigrant workers at work? Pick fruit and vegetables or pay 6 dollars a tomato? Hello? Anyone?

I imagine those exploited foreign workers are happy to have those jobs and most Americans would be happy to kick out all the illegals even if it mean paying "six dollars for a tomato" (yeah, right).

Besides, no one invited them to commit mass genocide on the populations they decimated and replaced.

What mass genocide? The population of non-whites has exploded because of white people.

All the guilt in the world does not change that.

Good. Lets stop feeling guility then.
 
Anti-racist doesn't mean anti-white.

Says you.

An anti-racist is someone that is opposed to(anti) hatred or intolerance of another race or other races(racist).

The only racism that antis care about is that of white people. You'll rarely here antis condemn the racism of non-whites, in fact most of them don't even think non-whites can be racist. They only think white people can be racist which ironically is racist itself.

Whites are ironically the least racist people on Earth. This is why we let our treasonous governments flood our countries with non-whites without too much of a fuss. There are zero non-white countries that allow as much alien immigration as the average white one.
 
Its mostly because all the white guilt does not stop them from continuing to loot the people from other cultures at the same time as they whine about maintaining the homogeneity of their own. See any racists boycotting stuff that comes from other countries? Any of them willing to replace the immigrant workers at work? Pick fruit and vegetables or pay 6 dollars a tomato? Hello? Anyone?

Besides, no one invited them to commit mass genocide on the populations they decimated and replaced. All the guilt in the world does not change that.
Fine. Let's talk about Malaysia, then. How about Indonesia?
Any whites in government in Iran?
Any in Pakistan, or India? Saudi Arabia?
Show us all how they reject American and western luxuries when they can get them.

Please tell me about these non-racist cultures you defend, S.A.M.
 
Fine. Let's talk about Malaysia, then. How about Indonesia?
Any whites in government in Iran?
Any in Pakistan, or India? Saudi Arabia?

Please tell me about these non-racist cultures you defend, S.A.M.

You mean they aren't white?:cool:

What are they, green?

Besides, the Iranians had a healthy dose of Western government in the 50s through 70s, and the Pakistanis and Saudis are enjoying it by proxy now. We Indians were blessed for over 200 years with the same.
 
Says you.

The only racism that antis care about is that of white people. You'll rarely here antis condemn the racism of non-whites, in fact most of them don't even think non-whites can be racist. They only think white people can be racist which ironically is racist itself.

Whites are ironically the least racist people on Earth. This is why we let our treasonous governments flood our countries with non-whites without too much of a fuss. There are zero non-white countries that allow as much alien immigration as the average white one.

Anyone's ideas (including yours) are not part of the definition of any word.
I posted the meaning of the term anti-racist, you on the other hand merely stated your perception of it.

So I can return your comment to you... Says you.
 
Says you.



The only racism that antis care about is that of white people. You'll rarely here antis condemn the racism of non-whites, in fact most of them don't even think non-whites can be racist. They only think white people can be racist which ironically is racist itself.

Whites are ironically the least racist people on Earth. This is why we let our treasonous governments flood our countries with non-whites without too much of a fuss. There are zero non-white countries that allow as much alien immigration as the average white one.

Can you tell me where whites as a society have been subjected to oppression and genocide by non-whites?
 
Besides, the Iranians had a healthy dose of Western government in the 50s through 70s, and the Pakistanis and Saudis are enjoying it by proxy now. We Indians were blessed for over 200 years with the same.
I was speaking about the tendency of those countries to look after their own... and, in fact, have less incidence of non-native individuals rising to power politically speaking than the western countries you accuse of racial eliteism.

You cannot comment on racism displayed by western countries, while failing to confront your own.
Can you imagine the furor it would cause should the US, for example, ban Obama from the presidential election simly because he isn't white and christian? And yet that is precisely what occurs in Malaysia. Care to comment on that?

The thread you started has no bearing on this point.
 
Actually, I'm probably deflecting myself by only speaking of whites being in government in those countries. Expand it to include the numerous and economically-necessary Chinese or Indians in southeast asia, just by way of example, not having any real representation in government.
 
I was speaking about the tendency of those countries to look after their own... and, in fact, have less incidence of non-native individuals rising to power politically speaking than the western countries you accuse of racial eliteism.

You cannot comment on racism displayed by western countries, while failing to confront your own.
Can you imagine the furor it would cause should the US, for example, ban Obama from the presidential election simly because he isn't white and christian? And yet that is precisely what occurs in Malaysia. Care to comment on that?

The thread you started has no bearing on this point.

Look after their own? Own what? Color, race, religion? Care to show me one Western President who was not a Caucasian male just 50 years ago?
The last 50 years have been a joke, with a front of liberty and equality covering economic malingering on the part of a few people in power. Subjective interpretations of the social fallout of ecopolitical conditions imposed on the people are merely ways of creating a false frame, intended to mislead about true motivations.

For all their backwardness, even the Asians have done better than that- without the benefit of the economic advantages. :rolleyes:
 
Can you tell me where whites as a society have been subjected to oppression and genocide by non-whites?

Spain, Italy, the balkans, anatolia, russia, Poland, Hungary etc. etc. This whole conversation stinks of some sophmoric my team is better than yours
 
Spain, Italy, the balkans, anatolia, russia, Poland, Hungary etc. etc. This whole conversation stinks of some sophmoric my team is better than yours

Whites have been oppressed as a society in these places by nonwhites? They picked on them for their race?

Is that why we are discussing a black sheep/hand poster in a secular Western country with access to the best technology and education, in the 21st century?
 
Check this out from todays paper I think it illustrates the point. Unfortunately nothing in english yet.

http://www.aftenposten.no/nyheter/iriks/article1982461.ece

The problems started when 47 year old Iranian born Ibrahim Batmani offered his hand in greeting to a new female colleague. She declined to shake his hand citing her religion.
Batmani explained that she didn't need to wear a hijab since "norway is a free country".
yadda yadda long story short he got fired for being a racist. He of course is going to be the new poster child as the conservatives integration ideal.

The story also says that he spent several years in prison in iran when he answered no to a questionaire that asked whether or not you support the theocracy.
 
Look after their own? Own what? Color, race, religion?
All of those, in varying degrees.
Some of those reasons are used as an excuse for the others.

Care to show me one Western President who was not a Caucasian male just 50 years ago?
And who is closer to changing that?
Us, or you?

The last 50 years have been a joke, with a front of liberty and equality covering economic malingering on the part of a few people in power. Subjective interpretations of the social fallout of ecopolitical conditions imposed on the people are merely ways of creating a false frame, intended to mislead about true motivations.
Agreed.

The difference here is in the habit of those false frames becoming "true".
An ideal, regardless of whether or not it is supported by the establishment as a sop to the people, has a habit of becoming more real as time goes by.
How did the west evolve from the crusades to what it is now?

For all their backwardness, even the Asians have done better than that- without the benefit of the economic advantages. :rolleyes:
Done better than what?

"Even" the asians? tch, tch.
S.A.M., are you showing some prejudice here? :p
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top