SAM said:
I think Switzerland will lose credibility as a neutral arbiter for any issues where Muslims are concerned [like Palestine] and will be seen as a state with rising Islamophobia.
This pattern, in which the more "ambitious" Muslims find a weak spot in both the understanding of their base and the social mores of the target polity, and gin up a controversy at once trivial to their religion in the target community and inflammatory to its adherents elsewhere (so they can't lose), is interesting.
Apparently, any political decision anywhere that restricts what any Muslims anywhere else find symbolic ruins the "neutrality" of the target polity, and they are relabeled as hostile and classified with the rest of the hostiles.
And any hostile reaction to the classification itself - any hostile response to the accusation of bigotry and hostility from any Muslim spokesman, by any fraction of the polity involved - "cements" the "impression".
Gregory Bateson's term (if you recall, one of those secular humanists who is safely dismissed unread as unhappy with his life and trying to push it on others) for this was "schismogenesis". It's a general category in which "arms race" is found, among other preliminaries to disaster.
SAM said:
Comments by the people's party that they will drop out of international treaties rather than follow them, will only cement this impression. The damage will be to the Swiss brand and will affect Swiss credibility
A while ago someone made a comment about people who get into fights in one bar after another. The comment was that maybe they should think a bit, before blaming the bars.
That might also apply to those who watch the guy get into all those fights.