This just ain't fair, helmet-wise:
"Tomorrow, little Jim can wear the helmet."
At least this one is an equal opportunist:
I bet there are less kids killed in India on motorcycle (while not driving) than on an ATV in the USA...
yes, I meant as passengers. Hey here is an interesting moral question:
You have 1 bike, 4 kids and 2 helmets (let's suppose they fit everyone), how do you decide who gets a helmet?
I guess he was reasoning like this: Well, I am the most important, so I need one. The kid in the front gets the best view, the 2nd kid is protected because he is sandwitched between 2 and the same for kid #3, so the kid in the back gets one because he could fall off....
...so the kid in the back gets one because he could fall off....
Or the kid has fallen off so many times he now has to wear a helmet.