Australia bans small breasts

[Rav]

http://www.somebodythinkofthechildren.com/australia-bans-small-breasts/

The Australian Sex Party (ASP) said Wednesday that the Australian Classification Board (ACB) is now banning depictions of small-breasted women in adult publications and films. It comes just a week after it was found that material with depictions of females ejaculating during orgasm are now Refused Classification and Australian Customs directed to confiscate it.

I honestly don't know what to say. Something has been going on in this country lately and it's profoundly unsettling.

 

[S.A.M.]

Maybe small breasts are incompatible with Australian values.

Maybe depictions of female ejaculation will be oppressive to Australian women, who will feel imposed upon because they never have any

 

[Rav]

Maybe small breasts are incompatible with Australian values.

At least that would be funny, in an "I'm about to get my arse kicked by a feminist for laughing" kind of way.

The issue has come up before as a result of discussion about mandatory Internet filtering. Basically, it's all about child pornography. In this country, child pornography is child pornography, even if it's not. A woman could be 25, but if she looks younger than 18, it's against the law. But now, apparently, having small breasts makes a woman look like she's younger than 18, even if she's 45.

 

[S.A.M.]

There is only one possible response to this : Japanese hentai

 

[Search & Destroy]

In other words the The Australian Sex Party is run by boob-enlargement conglomerates. Ah well not surprising. Nobody cares about small-breasted porn anyway.

 

[princelove]

Damn

 

[Mrs.Lucysnow]

So the porn industry is creating its own guidelines which basically already existed. Big deal.

 

[Nasor]

But now, apparently, having small breasts makes a woman look like she's younger than 18, even if she's 45.

Uh, no. This is exactly the opposite of what the linked article says.

Keep in mind it’s highly unlikely that a naked photograph of a 30, 40 or 50 year old woman with small breasts would ‘appear’ to be child pornography on the basis of her breast size alone. Small breasts do not automatically mean something will be banned or is illegal.

 

[Anti-Flag]

So the small breasted women require more support?

 

[Orleander]

so small boobs are too child like are they are banning small boobs because of pedophiles? How long til waxed and shaved vaginas are banned?

 

[CutsieMarie89]

so small boobs are too child like are they are banning small boobs because of pedophiles? How long til waxed and shaved vaginas are banned?

Probably not long. I assume certain clothing and hairstyles must already be on the out. (ie pigtails, high ponytails, knee high socks, plaid skirts, freckles across the nose)

 

[glaucon]

so small boobs are too child like are they are banning small boobs because of pedophiles? How long til waxed and shaved vaginas are banned?

I'm all for small boobs.
But since you mentioned it, I've got to say that I'm getting tired of the current bare fashion....

 

[madanthonywayne]

Probably not long. I assume certain clothing and hairstyles must already be on the out. (ie pigtails, high ponytails, knee high socks, plaid skirts, freckles across the nose)

So the Catholic School Girl look is out?

I wonder if her breasts are too small for Australia?

 

[Mrs.Lucysnow]

"The Australian Sex Party (ASP) said Wednesday that the Australian Classification Board (ACB) is now banning depictions of small-breasted women in adult publications and films. It comes just a week after it was found that material with depictions of females ejaculating during orgasm are now Refused Classification and Australian Customs directed to confiscate it.

ASP’s Fiona Patten writes on her party’s website that they are starting to see depictions of women in their late 20s being banned because they have an A cup breast size:

“This is in response to a campaign led by Kids Free 2 B Kids and promoted by Barnaby Joyce and Guy Barnett in Senate Estimates late last year. Mainstream companies such as Larry Flint’s Hustler produce some of the publications that have been banned. These companies are regulated by the FBI to ensure that only adult performers are featured in their publications.”

Patten writes that such bans may be an unintended consequence of the Senator’s actions “but they are largely responsible for the sharp increase in breast size in Australian adult magazines of late”."

Still I don't understand what's the big deal. I mean big breasts have always been more popular than small in the adult entertainment industry and women regularly change their small breasts to large in order to work in said industry. Now they are using child pornography as an excuse to do what they are naturally inclined to do anyway...which is promote big titties

Now this I find strangely unfeminist and anachronistic:

According to Patten, female ejaculations films are being Refused Classification on one of two grounds:

That the depictions are a form of urination which is banned under the label of ‘golden showers’ in the Classification Guidelines or
Female ejaculation is an ‘abhorrent’ depiction

Female ejaculation is an ‘abhorrent’ depiction

Female ejaculation is abhorrent? Strange.