Now, I dare you to argue further this idiotic point of atheism being a "belief". It's not subject to interpretation given the meanings that atheists themselves subscribe to.
Go ahead. Argue with me.
Hey you asked
Umm.. err... not quite what I had in mind, but funny nevertheless!
Umm.. err... not quite what I had in mind, but funny nevertheless!
So it would seem
Being as it were the philosophy section, however, could you be persuaded to elaborate on the differences between your thought processes and mine where observation and hypothesis are concerned?
Found one!
You seem to be irrationally hostile and defiant toward the One Cat, and to have mistaken entirely its omnipresent incorporeal nature. It is already "over".SAM said:I did and my rebuttal would be to decapitate your cat.
Following that, I am willing to pay tithe every time it mews.
Send it over
You seem to be irrationally hostile and defiant toward the One Cat, and to have mistaken entirely its omnipresent incorporeal nature. It is already "over".
Why are you so prideful, so lacking in humility and irrationally fixated on the meagre flailings of your reason? You have yet to provide a single observation from your vaunted empiricism and reductionist approach that supports your afelinism or justifies your faith in your disbelief.
Be it known that the Cat is not mocked.
As the position of the cultist staggers, they must attempt to break down and diminish the argument into semantics in which definitions only having meaning to the agenda of deception.
At this point, cult thinking can easily define black as white.
Oh come on sam. You're just a silly doofus with a funny looking cat.Yeah notice all the recriminations sans any attempt to address the philosophy?
Apparently ad homs are favored over explanations in the realm of atheistic rationale.
Oh come on sam. You're just a silly doofus with a funny looking cat.
There. I win.
Wait... what?