Are you happy with how SF is being moderated

just answer yes or no

  • yes

    Votes: 30 51.7%
  • no

    Votes: 28 48.3%

  • Total voters
    58
Simple question, yes or no answer, no comments necessary.

Very few things - including this - are that simple. I would choose "more or less" and if given a scale of 1 - 10 I would vote 8.

Therefore, I cannot vote as it now stands.
 
actually, no... dont make this more complex than it is
if you are willing do give the moderation an 8 out of 10, you are obviously satisfied with it
 
Satisfied. I can't think of anything to complain of (I gave it a whole 3 seconds effort).
 
actually, no... dont make this more complex than it is
if you are willing do give the moderation an 8 out of 10, you are obviously satisfied with it

Actually, yes. I'm NOT completely satisfied and that precisely what a "yes" vote would indicate. Nor am I completely dissatisfied either, which is what a "no" vote would indicate.

Have you noticed you're not getting a lot of participation? I really think a 1 - 10 scale would get you a lot more action.
 
Actually, yes. I'm NOT completely satisfied and that precisely what a "yes" vote would indicate. Nor am I completely dissatisfied either, which is what a "no" vote would indicate.

Have you noticed you're not getting a lot of participation? I really think a 1 - 10 scale would get you a lot more action.

then make your own godamn poll
i like the way this one is
 
Indeed. We need considerably more permabans around here. Put me in charge and I'll start cleaning the place up a bit. :cool:
 
The moderation on sciforums could be better, and it could be worse. The general trend over the last few weeks is that the moderators seemed to have loosened up a little, which is good.
 
We should have the 'old' system back, from before it was abolished.
The only improvement it needs is for the moderators to stop going into discussion about the system. Maybe a 3-monthly referendum could be set up to see how things are going..
 
Back
Top