Because I am.
I was watching "Walking with Dinosaurs" and in addition to the evidence shelle out which you could get from skeletal morphology and the like, there was a ton of physiological add-in which we simply have no idea about; that certain mammal-like reptiles supported offspring with milk. There's no doubt evolution is right, and this stuff probably isn't far from reality, but is it really necessary to present stuff we can't really glean from fossil evidence as fact? We're shooting ourselves in the foot here.
Geoff
I was watching "Walking with Dinosaurs" and in addition to the evidence shelle out which you could get from skeletal morphology and the like, there was a ton of physiological add-in which we simply have no idea about; that certain mammal-like reptiles supported offspring with milk. There's no doubt evolution is right, and this stuff probably isn't far from reality, but is it really necessary to present stuff we can't really glean from fossil evidence as fact? We're shooting ourselves in the foot here.
Geoff