Science needs a few edits in Wikipedia if it is talking about antimatter. I read some parts that were antimatter, and about 80% of it was talking about normal particles. For example it says....
Which is 100% factual to me (not sure about the number of dimensions, X/Y/Z is 6 if you use negatives), and exists right here around us. There is nothing dangerous about that description, it creates standard particles. For example some sinks are in water, and glass. This transparency is totally because they are sinks, because photons travel through sink holes, so obviously don't make them very visible.
A lot of the time science will find a particle with an opposing spin. This is a second form of physics separate to squirts and sinks. Newtons Law that every action has an equal and opposite reaction works at many levels...
X/Y/Z
-X/-Y/-Z
Sink
Squirt
spin left
spin right
scale up
Scale down
And I find that antimatter is being mixed up with different physics. I personally think that the most explosive would be the opposite spins, as that would trap the most energy. So I would call that one antimatter. But Wikipedia needs rewriting.
Karl Pearson proposed the existence of "squirts" (sources) and sinks of the flow of aether. The squirts represented normal matter and the sinks represented negative matter, a term which Pearson is credited with coining. Pearson's theory required a fourth dimension for the aether to flow from and into,
Which is 100% factual to me (not sure about the number of dimensions, X/Y/Z is 6 if you use negatives), and exists right here around us. There is nothing dangerous about that description, it creates standard particles. For example some sinks are in water, and glass. This transparency is totally because they are sinks, because photons travel through sink holes, so obviously don't make them very visible.
A lot of the time science will find a particle with an opposing spin. This is a second form of physics separate to squirts and sinks. Newtons Law that every action has an equal and opposite reaction works at many levels...
X/Y/Z
-X/-Y/-Z
Sink
Squirt
spin left
spin right
scale up
Scale down
And I find that antimatter is being mixed up with different physics. I personally think that the most explosive would be the opposite spins, as that would trap the most energy. So I would call that one antimatter. But Wikipedia needs rewriting.