Anthroposaurus sapiens

Doc Brown

Registered Member
Contrary to popular belief, it was not an asteroid that killed the dinosaurs. It was a supernova, 880 light-years away ((Astronomical Journal, v.77, pp.210-214 (April 1972)). The dinosaurs show evidence of a lot of radiation.

The minumum size to cause a mass extinction at that distance is 26 solar masses. Even if it had been 200 solar masses (that's how big the largest known star is), any dinosaur under 18 feet of rock at the time would have survived.

OK, what's my point?

The velociraptors were as smart as chimpanzees are today. It was only five million years from chimpanzees to humans.

The last few million years of the Cretaceous showed a marked reduction in diversity of dinosaur species: the earlier vigorous adaptive radiation of the hadrosaurs and the ceratopsians similarly gave way to a yielding of variety. For the last two million years of the Cretaceous, a single genus of each—- saurolophus and triceratops respectively—- dominated the landscape, although they did so in vast numbers.

No gradual environmental change is going to eliminate genetic variation in genus after genus of dinosaurs. That very variation will guarantee adaptation to the changes by natural selection before genetic variation has been significantly pruned. The motive power of evolution is expansion of diversity with environmental change. The dinosaurs' loss of variety is much more characteristic of the loss of variety in species we are seeing today—- by unnatural selection—- at the hand of man.

Caches of bones of a single species are regarded by paleoanthropologists as suggesting husbandry. In the development of man, various cultures seemed to concentrate on ibex, horses, reindeer and so on. Could it be that ceratopsians and hadrosaurs were actually domestic animals like cows and sheep kept for food? If so, it is unmistakable evidence of intelligence.

Yes, but what does this have to do with UFOs?

Some of the "aliens" could actually be subterrestrial descendants of the anthroposaurs.
 
DOC.......that's godawesome. Though I am always looking at the alternatives to the SCI mainstream, the idea stretches the imagination.

Previously & continuing is my minor consideration that disease........may have ended the Saurian Race!.....

Hellishly rational & observational thinking, Sir....................
 
There's more. One of their skulls has actually been found. Go to http://www.starchildproject.com/ to read all about it.

Assuming that the human skulls in the pictures would have a hat size of 6 1/2, that would give the Star Child skull a hat size of 9. The skull is as developed at that of a six-year-old human. If this anthroposaur had survived to adulthood, it would have a hat size of 10! By contrast, the largest human hat size is 8 3/4.

For those of you who point to hydrocephalus as a possibility, the skull is too symmetrical to be hydrocephalic, and the downward contour on the top of the skull would not be possible.

There is more evidence that it is not human: the skull is 40% as dense as a person's and is just as sturdy, and its eye sockets are bowl-shaped and 3 cm deep (our eye sockets are cone-shaped and are 5 cm deep) and are centered in the middle of the cheek (those eyes are HUGE). Such large eyes would be required of us if we lived underground. In fact, for its size, the tarsier has the largest eyes. Proportionately, it's like us having grapefriut-sized eyes.

The large head is also an adaptation to living underground. The deinonychus had 65% of its brain dedicated to visual processing (I think it's 5% in humans), and evidence suggests that it lived in an environment with little light (which rules out any extinction theories involving dust blocking out the sun). If we only look at 35% of the anthroposaur's brain, it's less than 5% larger than an average human's brain.

And aussie, the dinosaurs show evidence of a massive dose of radiation. Perhaps the diseases are from the weakened immune system that would result from the radiation.
 
Back
Top