Who writes these posts and threads?
One of the greatest things in life is figuring things out about others. Not for the purpose of using that information against them, but to understand their point of view. My desire in life is always try to understand others based on where they're coming from, though that does not mean that I will believe or act as they do.
So, let me take a few posters and expound.
<b>Emerald</b>
Why does Emerald choose to represent herself with an animated GIF emerald as an avatar? It is a cool avatar to be sure, but why that one? What is meant by the nickname of Emerald? Perhaps her avatar could also be seen as a diamond. Diamonds are stones (gems?) which have undergone immense pressure to become what they are. Diamonds, or emeralds for that matter, usually contain many angles, with smooth, almost linear planes--suggesting an amazing ability to look at an issue from different angles, while still maintaining fluidity and a sureness.
<b>tiassa</b>
Having studied Spanish and being able to speak Japanese, I have often wondered if there was some play-on foreign language interpretation of this nickname. But I haven't debunked it just yet. Perhaps it's just some random nickname, but I don't think so. I think it has some form of historical significance. This tiassa is one of those few people in the world that sees the lunacy of others' thoughts but doesn't try to demean them when he points this out. Since tiassa has an almost inexhaustible means of drawing upon varying references, it stands to reason that tiassa has a most comprehensive (and possibly eclectic) array of literature. Like some of the people on this forum (myself included) tiassa is probably one of those people that reads nearly constantly.
<b>Cris</b>
Despite the hard-lined exterior coating of science-based thoughts, Cris has the ability to convey ideas in easier-to-understand terms. He claims that he is not book-smart (I think?), but I beg to differ. Cris provokes readers with insights into the practicality of ideas rather than as to whether the ideas are right or wrong. But why thumper (as an avatar)? Perhaps it is because thumper was one of the characters that seemed to have his head on his shoulders and was pretty much independent from everyone else.
<b>Malaclypse</b>
Cool nickname. Self-described as the Perturber, Malaclypse quite frequently answers posts with one- or two-liners that don't necessarily offend, but don't really give away any hint at sarcasm or genuineness. In short, Malaclypse keeps people guessing. And, of course, Malaclypse has an excellent avatar.
<b>FA_Q2</b>
In response to one of Lyndale's vain attempts to get fame about his demon-possessing basement, FA_Q2 responded with something that I found profoundly hilarious: "What are you circling? What am I looking at?" It took someone else to point out that FA_Q2 could be pronounced in a different manner. Not quite sure on FA_Q2, but I'm pretty sure he's quite the responsible person. Doesn't leave things unfinished and pursues things until an answer is either found or, at least, addressed.
<b>wet1</b>
Seems like a person that likes to keep things in line; makes sure that things don't get too out of line, so to speak. He would be the kind of guy that would probably mediate a discussion or argument between friends. Most likely well-balanced in his approaches to discussions, and wet1 adds a sense of functionality to his posts.
<b>ripleofdeath</b>
Cracks me up. Some of the things this guy says reminds me of a New Zealander I met while in Japan of all places. But both my friend and rip tend to say some pretty off the wall things, which gets me thinking along different paths than I'm used to. I'd say ripleofdeath has the ability to evoke thought and at least a smile out of the readers of his post.
<b>mirror</b>
Exceptionally selective in his responses. Has an amazing ability to only answer what someone questions him. (Sure there are anomalies). Initially, I thought the identity of mirror was someone I knew until I realized that mirror's thoughts and posts are quite well-thought out, which suggests a fair amount of either perfectionism or an extremely thorough mind. Either one is a positive attribute.
<b>HOWARDSTERN</b>
Has an exceptional natural talent to offend, but every once in a while, he throws out sentences where I have to say to myself, "Wow, that's pretty good. That obviously took some thought to formulate." Not to say that STERN is inept, just that his thoughts are more tangent than linear. But, he's another one that adds a fair amount of humor to the discussions.
<b>pragmathen</b>
Hey, where's my couch?
P.S. I, of course, meant no offense in this. Also, if I forgot some other posters (and I'm sure I did), I'm sorry--time constraints. It just acted as an exercise of thought, something to think about. I know I portray myself in certain lights to specific readers. Just letting you know how one reader sees you. I guess the cool thing about Anonymity is the potential to say what you really think.
thanks,
prag
One of the greatest things in life is figuring things out about others. Not for the purpose of using that information against them, but to understand their point of view. My desire in life is always try to understand others based on where they're coming from, though that does not mean that I will believe or act as they do.
So, let me take a few posters and expound.
<b>Emerald</b>
Why does Emerald choose to represent herself with an animated GIF emerald as an avatar? It is a cool avatar to be sure, but why that one? What is meant by the nickname of Emerald? Perhaps her avatar could also be seen as a diamond. Diamonds are stones (gems?) which have undergone immense pressure to become what they are. Diamonds, or emeralds for that matter, usually contain many angles, with smooth, almost linear planes--suggesting an amazing ability to look at an issue from different angles, while still maintaining fluidity and a sureness.
<b>tiassa</b>
Having studied Spanish and being able to speak Japanese, I have often wondered if there was some play-on foreign language interpretation of this nickname. But I haven't debunked it just yet. Perhaps it's just some random nickname, but I don't think so. I think it has some form of historical significance. This tiassa is one of those few people in the world that sees the lunacy of others' thoughts but doesn't try to demean them when he points this out. Since tiassa has an almost inexhaustible means of drawing upon varying references, it stands to reason that tiassa has a most comprehensive (and possibly eclectic) array of literature. Like some of the people on this forum (myself included) tiassa is probably one of those people that reads nearly constantly.
<b>Cris</b>
Despite the hard-lined exterior coating of science-based thoughts, Cris has the ability to convey ideas in easier-to-understand terms. He claims that he is not book-smart (I think?), but I beg to differ. Cris provokes readers with insights into the practicality of ideas rather than as to whether the ideas are right or wrong. But why thumper (as an avatar)? Perhaps it is because thumper was one of the characters that seemed to have his head on his shoulders and was pretty much independent from everyone else.
<b>Malaclypse</b>
Cool nickname. Self-described as the Perturber, Malaclypse quite frequently answers posts with one- or two-liners that don't necessarily offend, but don't really give away any hint at sarcasm or genuineness. In short, Malaclypse keeps people guessing. And, of course, Malaclypse has an excellent avatar.
<b>FA_Q2</b>
In response to one of Lyndale's vain attempts to get fame about his demon-possessing basement, FA_Q2 responded with something that I found profoundly hilarious: "What are you circling? What am I looking at?" It took someone else to point out that FA_Q2 could be pronounced in a different manner. Not quite sure on FA_Q2, but I'm pretty sure he's quite the responsible person. Doesn't leave things unfinished and pursues things until an answer is either found or, at least, addressed.
<b>wet1</b>
Seems like a person that likes to keep things in line; makes sure that things don't get too out of line, so to speak. He would be the kind of guy that would probably mediate a discussion or argument between friends. Most likely well-balanced in his approaches to discussions, and wet1 adds a sense of functionality to his posts.
<b>ripleofdeath</b>
Cracks me up. Some of the things this guy says reminds me of a New Zealander I met while in Japan of all places. But both my friend and rip tend to say some pretty off the wall things, which gets me thinking along different paths than I'm used to. I'd say ripleofdeath has the ability to evoke thought and at least a smile out of the readers of his post.
<b>mirror</b>
Exceptionally selective in his responses. Has an amazing ability to only answer what someone questions him. (Sure there are anomalies). Initially, I thought the identity of mirror was someone I knew until I realized that mirror's thoughts and posts are quite well-thought out, which suggests a fair amount of either perfectionism or an extremely thorough mind. Either one is a positive attribute.
<b>HOWARDSTERN</b>
Has an exceptional natural talent to offend, but every once in a while, he throws out sentences where I have to say to myself, "Wow, that's pretty good. That obviously took some thought to formulate." Not to say that STERN is inept, just that his thoughts are more tangent than linear. But, he's another one that adds a fair amount of humor to the discussions.
<b>pragmathen</b>
Hey, where's my couch?
P.S. I, of course, meant no offense in this. Also, if I forgot some other posters (and I'm sure I did), I'm sorry--time constraints. It just acted as an exercise of thought, something to think about. I know I portray myself in certain lights to specific readers. Just letting you know how one reader sees you. I guess the cool thing about Anonymity is the potential to say what you really think.
thanks,
prag