I'd be interested to hear her argument for it being a religion?
Anarchy is not living like wild animals, not social chaos, not complete lack of any restraint or laws.. That is just a bunch of propaganda by the 'conservatives' in power who'd fear losing said power.
Anarchy means that local communities can make their own 'laws' and rules of conduct and enforce same. The feds are for the protection of borders and thats it. We the people take care of our own problems in our own neighborhoods, our own communities. Its not a 'wild-in-the-streets rampage of bomb throwing freaks'! It is just an alternative form of 'non'-government with advantages and disadvantages like everything else.
It certainly threatens some people though, 'authoritarian' personalities, obsessive compulsives, anal retentives (Republikkkans?), fundamnentalists...
It is no kind of religion unless some mental defective treats it like one. Actually, to be made into a religion, anarchy would have to be forced to immitate the same old patriarchial BS that we have already. One of the strengths of anarchy is its flexibility... There is no 'flex' in religion! *spits in the dust*
See here
and
Something interesting re; Anarchy in cyberland