_____________________Fundamentalist literalism also distinguishes itself from social revolutionary or reformist projections of the future that likewise seek legitimacy through an appeal to divine law, revelation, or an ideal original community. This identification with an ideal original order can be effected in either mythical or utopian terms. As myth it has the function of a restorative surmounting of a crisis. The "Golden Age" is to be recreated through a return to its principles of order as handed down verbatim. As utopia, in contrast, the ideal order serves the purposes of a "Progressive" social reformist or social revolutionary surmounting of the crisis. Not the letter but the "spirit" of the ideal order as it was once in the past is to be realized under new conditions. Consequently, "mythical" thinking is characterized tendentially by a statutory ethic; "utopian" thinking, in contrast, is supported by a radical ethic of conviction. As with all typological distinctions, borderline cases and other variations are conceivable .... (16)
Someone ( George Bush ? ) recently said that American families should be more like the Waltons. The thought of it made me puke. Anyone disagree. Feel free to bring your cracker barrel
I think children would be happier/healthier growing up in a multi-generational home. My mother in law lived a few blocks from us and my kids benefited from it. I would have had no problem with her moving in, and we even bought our house thinking of it.
My father had a strange "Ozzie and Harriet" delusion that, left unsatisfied, eventually cracked him. Idylls exist as idealistic expressions. Expecting people to be perfect even in their imperfections is a recipe for disaster.
Of course, yearning for some former "Golden Age" is a common sentiment, even more so in times of trouble. We should not be surprised to hear that President Bush has stooped to this particular sentimentality.
As a side note, the following comes from Riesebrodt's Pious Passions:
_____________________
Notes:
Riesebrodt, Martin. Pious Passions: The Emergence of Modern Fundamentalism in the United States and Iran. (1993) Trans. Don Renau. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press, 1998.
I agree with you. I have a good relationship with my grandchildren.
But I find the Waltons too good to be true. I would hate to associate with such people if they existed.
but shouldn't we be more like them? Shouldn't people be too good to be true?
Myles said:
That sems like an interesting book. I shall try and get a copy
I do agree that families should be naturally larger, say like that of the Waltons, and I do think my little nephews benefitted from having their grandpa move in with them, after he had his stroke and needed to move in, to not be alone and have proper "assisted living," as he was mostly confined to a wheelchair after that, and so weak as to often need help to get to the bathroom and get his meals and such.
Can't see where that "puke" factor could come in there. I think I would agree with Bush on that.
I do agree that families should be naturally larger, say like that of the Waltons, and I do think my little nephews benefitted from having their grandpa move in with them, after he had his stroke and needed to move in, to not be alone and have proper "assisted living," as he was mostly confined to a wheelchair after that, and so weak as to often need help to get to the bathroom and get his meals and such.
Can't see where that "puke" factor could come in there. I think I would agree with Bush on that.
The resemblances between W's family setups - including the nuclear family he has direct control over - and the Walton's, are not all that striking to me.
Maybe it's other people's families that should be more like the Waltons, in his view.
What makes me puke is not the aspect of family life portrayed but the fact that the Waltons are too good to be true. I do not believe there was ever a time when such people existed.
Then you would be mistaken.
Perhaps not in your part of the world but it was actually quite common in the U.S. a century ago. Prior to the time transportation was widely available and most families were dependent on farming or a family business for their livelihoods, they had a tendency to be pretty clannish and lived quite close to each other. Three generations living in a single large home was fairly common.
It was the widespread adaptation of the automobile and factory/industrial jobs that changed all that.
I know all that. My point is that they are all so bloody saintly. That' what I meant by too good to be true. Most, if not all societies, were like that before the advent of the car, for obvious reasons.
I don't know about "bloody saintly" but for the most part they all got along quite well - they had too, there was no where else to go. So they adapted to each other's individual differences MUCH, MUCH better than families do today.
...But I find the Waltons too good to be true. I would hate to associate with such people if they existed.
Yeah, all that wholesome goodness, innocence, kindness, love, compassion, concern, consideration, caring, and other good things would just be too much, huh?