Cactus Jack
But doesn't the idea of end of conscienceness cheapen life and make it seem less worth living?
I would contest that the proposal that consciousness ends at death would make life more valuable and worth living. Who you are and what you do counts now rather in the after-life. No belief, act, or confession will absolve your actions, you are responsible to those whom you affect rather than some heavenly judge. And that you only have this one, brief, moment in time rather than all of eternity makes it more valuable rather than less.
Neutrino_Albatross
Then of course the people who remember you will just die in a few more years anyway. You have to build a major empire to effect the course of this planet. Rather sad when you think about it.
Every interaction you have with someone affects the course of this planet. The large tip you gave the helpful waiter, the encouragement you gave your child, and the punch in the nose you gave to the man who insulted your wife all have far reaching affect. Like the "Butterfly Effect"; minute variations in a chaotic system can have far-reaching consequence.
Asguard
Athism's dont belive anything come after death
so they want to live forever
hence they are responceable for the worlds over crouding.
Straw man argument Asguard. You make several unfounded assumptions to get to your conclusion: 1. Atheists don't believe anything comes after death. 2. Atheists want to live forever. 3. An increase of longevity is the reason for the population increase (I'm assuming your point here, unless you're proposing that the world is being overpopulated by imortal atheists). 4. Atheists are responsible for the increase of longevity. None of which are givens, some of which are provably false.
~Raithere