According to bible itself, Jesus is both a liar and a lunatic

Joeman

Eviiiiiiiil Clown
Registered Senior Member
Mathew 24, verse by verse by Mark Smith

Matthew 24:

1 Jesus had left the Temple and was going on His way, when His disciples came and called His attention to the Temple buildings.

[His disciples bring to his attention the beautiful buildings of the Jewish temple, one of the wonders of the world at that time.]

2 "You see all these?" He replied; "in solemn truth I tell you that there will not be left here one stone upon another that will not be pulled down."

3 Afterwards He was on the Mount of Olives and was seated there when the disciples came to Him, apart from the others, and said, "Tell us when this will be; and what will be the sign of your Coming and of the Close of the Age?"

[The Address on the Envelope Jesus is being questioned by, and is responding to, his Apostles, and no one else here in this 24th chapter of Matthew. The text goes out of its way to communicate this. This is not an envelope addressed "Occupant" but rather addressed specifically "To The Apostles". The entire discourse shows the message was for the First Century Apostles, and not concerned with people living thousands of years in the future. Please follow the "us's" and "you's" etc. that I have put in bold formatting, to see exactly whom Jesus was speaking to. ]

4 "Take care that no one misleads you," answered Jesus;

["You" = First Century Apostles. The warnings are to the First Century Apostles, and NOT to people millions of years distant.]

5 "for many will come assuming my name and saying `I am the Christ;' and they will mislead many.

6 And before long you will hear of wars and rumours of wars. Do not be alarmed, for such things must be; but the End is not yet.

["Before Long" = Soon]

[The "before long" is reinforced in the Greek by the word "mello" meaning, "to be on the point of doing or suffering something".]

7 For nation will rise in arms against nation, kingdom against kingdom, and there will be famines and earthquakes in various places;

8 But all these miseries are but like the early pains of childbirth.

["Pains of Childbirth" = Soon]

[Again, no room for thousands of years. This was all due- and soon.]

9 "At that time they will deliver you up to punishment and will put you to death; and you will be objects of hatred to all the nations because you are called by my name.

[ Persecution Fulfilled in First Century Another indication this is a First Century event. For those of you who buy into the book, the book by William McBirnie, "The Search for the Twelve Apostles" claims to document how, within the First Century, all these Apostles to whom Jesus spoke ended up being persecuted, some even to death. And again, Jesus is talking to the "YOU" of the First Century Apostles, and not to every Tom, Dick and Harry since then.]

10 Then will many stumble and fall, and they will betray one another and hate one another.

11 Many false prophets will rise up and lead multitudes astray;

12 and because of the prevalent disregard of God's law the love of the great majority will grow cold;

[Apostasy Fulfilled in First Century

"The Apostasy" was a daily fact of First Century church life. Judas Iscariot, and Ananias & Sapphira were apostates near the beginning of the Christian era, and toward the end of the First Century, 1st John 2:18 records the then current existence of not one, but many, "anti-Christs". Paul even names some apostates "For Demas, having loved this present world, has deserted me… Alexander the coppersmith did me much harm; the Lord will repay him according to his deeds… he has vigorously opposed our teaching." (2nd Timothy 4:10-1 5)]

13 but those who stand firm to the End shall be saved.

[ "Stand Firm To End" = Within Lifetime ]

[This is just one of several places within the New Testament where it is indicated that the Second Coming is something these Apostles (and others of that century) could, if they "stood firm", hope to see within their lifetime.

Other references are: Heb. 3:6, 14; Rev. 2:25,26 etc. The "shall be saved" is not the "instant-karma" salvation Televangelists hawk on their gaudy TV shows, but rather being saved from the destruction that was due to take place upon the Earth when the excrement hit the fan during Biblegod's "days of vengeance" (Lk 21:22) at the Second Coming. ]

14 And this Good News of the Kingdom shall be proclaimed throughout the whole world to set the evidence before all the Gentiles; and then the End will come.

[ Gospel ® Whole Earth: 1st Century Also The New Testament claims that well before the 1st Century ended the entire world had ALREADY been evangelized with the gospel. Examine the following two verses for confirmation of this claim:

So faith comes from what is heard, and what is heard comes by the preaching of Christ. But I ask, have they not heard? Indeed they have; for "Their voice has gone out to all the earth, and their words to the ends of the world." (Rm 10: 17,18 RSV)]

The gospel… has been proclaimed to every creature under heaven, and of which I, Paul, have become a servant.
(Col. 1:23 NIV) ]

15 "When you have seen (to use the language of the Prophet Daniel) the `Abomination of Desolation', standing in the Holy Place" --let the reader observe those words--

[ "Holy Place" = First Century Temple

In case no one noticed, there hasn't been a temple of Jehovah to "stand in" since the Jewish temple got razed in 70 AD. Once again, this points to a 1st Century era.

As for Christian Fundies who teach that another temple may some day be constructed, does that mean that your Biblegod is behind said construction, thus making it a "Holy Place"? Can just anybody, at any time, with or without prior authorization from your Biblegod, go around building temples that somehow then automatically become "holy"? If so, then what of the Mormon temples? What if all the Atheists got together, and built a temple there in Jerusalem? Constructing an object that looks like a living human body (i.e. a statue) or a "holy" temple does not make said object a living human body or a "holy" temple. ]

16 "then let those who are in Judaea escape to the hills;

17 let him who is on the roof not go down to fetch what is in his house;

18 nor let him who is outside the city stay to pick up his outer garment.

19 And alas for the women who at that time are with child or have infants!

20 "But pray that your flight may not be in winter, nor on the Sabbath;

21 for it will be a time of great suffering, such as never has been from the beginning of the world till now, and assuredly never will be again.

[First Century Israel

These phrases "those who are in Judaea" and "on a Sabbath" are a big hint that in location, this scenario is placed in the Israel of yesteryear. Another clue is the mentioning of people being up on roofs, indicates the flat roofs that were common back then during the First Century. These HINTS hint of First Century Israel, and NOT modern day Los Angeles or Tokyo.]

22 And if those days had not been cut short, no one would escape; but for the sake of God's own People those days will be cut short.

[I hope that modern theologians are not the ones allowed to define the word "short" in this verse. If so, the suffering may last for thousands of years!!! ]

23 "If at that time any one should say to you, `See, here is the Christ!' or `Here!' give no credence to it.

24 For there will rise up false Christs and false prophets, displaying wonderful signs and prodigies, so as to deceive, were it possible, even God's own People.

25 Remember, I have forewarned you.

["Remember" = Alive = First Century

Jesus couldn't ask these people to stop in the middle of all these future disasters to remember what he had told them years in their past, unless they would yet be alive in the midst of all these future disasters. No future generations are in view here. ]

26 If therefore they should say to you, `See, He is in the Desert!' do not go out there: or `See, He is indoors in the room!' do not believe it.

27 For just as the lightning flashes in the east and is seen to the very west, so will be the Coming of the Son of Man.

[Visibility = Problem for Preterist View

As with all things Christian, this doctrine of the Second Coming is fractured amongst various splinter groups. One such group, called the "Preterist", (and even this small splinter group is further splintered into even smaller groups) more or less believe that Jesus did return, however he returned in an "invisible" returning in 70 AD, and that's why everybody missed it.

The wording of Matthew, however, seems to contradict this belief. Matthew implies that if you were facing west- maybe toward where the sun just "set" an hour ago, and lightning strikes in the east, even miles behind your back, you can not help but see the entire sky light up. Likewise, Jesus is saying that his return will be so obvious and visible, that even if you weren't looking for it, you couldn't help but see it. Thus groups that have advocated an invisible "Second Coming" of Jesus do so in contradiction to what Jesus himself taught. The reason Jesus' return was not noticed in the First Century (or in 1914 if you're a JW) is not because it was invisible, but rather because it never happened. ]

28 Wherever the dead body is, there will the vultures flock together.

29 "But immediately after those times of distress the sun will be darkened, the moon will not shed her light, the stars will fall from the firmament, and the forces which control the heavens will be disordered and disturbed.

[Immediately = First Century

Having already established that previous events were predicted to take place within the First Century, these remaining events, (i.e. the end of the universe as we know it) which were to immediately follow, would also have to be within the First Century as well. ]

30 Then will appear the Sign of the Son of Man in the sky; and then will all the nations of the earth lament, when they see the Son of Man coming on the clouds of the sky with great power and glory.

["Immediately…Then" = First Century

Next, a "sign" is said to appear in the sky, following all the other sky disturbances mentioned above.

The use of the "then's" implies a fast-paced sequence which does not allow for any theorized thousand -year "gaps": "Then will appear the Sign…then will all nations lament". Thus, once again, the era is locked into the First Century. Also, the "Son of Man" theme is the same as in all the other 2nd Coming texts, texts whose fulfillment were likewise promised within the lifetime of the First Century hearers.]

31 And He will send out His angels with a loud trumpet-blast, and they will bring together His own People to Him from north, south, east and west--from one extremity of the world to the other.

[Yet Another Problem for the Preterist View

As the Preterists try to explain how Jesus returned invisibly in the First Century, they also need to explain how this verse was fulfilled without anyone noticing. How do you hide a worldwide infestation of billions of angels fluttering about in the sky while blowing horns at maximum volume? The preterists "answer" this via a common Christian dodge- they hide behind figurative language.]

32 "Now learn from the fig-tree the lesson it teaches. As soon as its branches have now become soft and it is bursting into leaf, you all know that summer is near.

33 So you also, when you see all these signs, may be sure that He is near--at your very door.

["When YOU See" = First Century Apostles

Jesus tells his Apostles "when you see all these signs". Not "if" or "maybe" but when. Jesus was thus guaranteeing them that all these signs would take place within their lifetime, including the Second Coming. Likewise note the reference to knowing summer is near if spring is already in bloom- yet another
indication of a very short time span being predicted. It doesn't require long convoluted theoretical theology about this being a "prediction" of Israel being reborn in 1948- the simplest explanation is usually best- Jesus was due to come in a short time, from THEIR perspective.

"At Your Very Door" = First Century

The phrase "He is near--at your very door" implies a few things. First, it implies the very next step will bring Jesus through the door. Second, whose "door" was he near? The Apostle's "door". ]

34 I tell you in solemn truth that the present generation will certainly not pass away without all these things having first taken place.

["Present Generation" = First Century

There is much more to be said about verse 34 and its key word "generation." For now, let me point out that this 34th verse does not exist in a vacuum; it is the culmination of the last several verses, indeed, the whole chapter, all time references, and all of which lead up a specific point in time: Jesus' Second Coming, and THAT within their (not YOUR) lifetime. The context allows no other interpretation. "Trust Me, I'm Not Lying" Jesus precedes the prophecy with "I tell you in solemn truth" and follows it in verse #35 with a claim that his words would outlast even the Universe. These facts should be a major hint this prophecy was an extremely important issue for him, and he wanted to be dead sure that nobody misunderstood him. In his own mind, even though he sincerely believed that he'd be back within that century, he was sincerely wrong. He did not, within the lifetime of that generation, return in the clouds, in the glory of Biblegod, with hordes of angels, with trumpets blowing. His prophecy turned out to be false, and that makes him a false prophet.

"All These Things" = Complete Package

Jesus says emphatically that "all these things" would happen before his then current generation had passed away. Jesus presents the entire package as a "take it or leave it" situation, picking and choosing not allowed. Some Christian "explanations" of this verse have attempted to slice & dice the 24th chapter into "some for back then, some for now, and maybe… some for the future". This fragmenting of the chapter is not allowed by Jesus' clear statement "all these things". ANY Christian theory that tries to explain away this "problem chapter" has to treat the chapter as a whole, and explain how all of it happened or didn't happen. Of course, since the date for the destruction (v. 2) of the Jewish temple is firmly established in history at 70 AD, and everything in this chapter is promised within a short time frame, this entire chapter is thus locked into the First Century, from which it can not escape.]

35 Earth and sky will pass away, but it is certain that my words will not pass away.

36 "But as to that day and the exact time no one knows--not even the angels of heaven, nor the Son, but the Father alone.

[Within Certain Limits ¹ Exact "Day & Time"

Some have quibbled in the best Clintonian tradition that Jesus' no-show can't be objected to because Jesus said no one knows the exact day & time. The exact day & time Jesus never gave, but I bet if he had, the Christians would invent an excuse for that blooper, too. Jesus didn't give the exact year, or month, or day, or hour, or minute- but so what? He gave limits- time limits, an "expiration date" if you will, beyond which, if he hadn't returned by then, he would become a FALSE PROPHET. He himself said he'd be back before that generation died off, therefore within the lifetime of his Apostles. As to the exact millisecond within that generational limit that he was due back, it doesn't matter. What matters is that his "expiration date" long since expired. Christians should deal with that LOG in their theological eye, and ignore the splinter as to what exact second within that time frame he was due.]

37 For as it was in the time of Noah, so it will be at the Coming of the Son of Man.

38 At that time, before the Deluge, men were busy eating and drinking, taking wives or giving them, up to the very day when Noah entered the Ark,

39 nor did they realise any danger till the Deluge came and swept them all away; so will it be at the Coming of the Son of Man.

[Noah's Flood Was Within Noah's Generation

The flood that "Noah" warned everyone about was due within "Noah's" generation, not 10,000 years later. Jesus promised his Apostles that, as it was with "Noah", so also with the Second Coming. Therefore, the Second Coming was due within their lifetime. NOTE: Some may have noticed that the spelling within the New Testament being quoted (Weymouth's Version) may differ from common usage. I noticed it too, but what should I do- correct it, or leave it as it is? I decided to leave it alone.]

40 Then will two men be in the open country: one will be taken away, and one left behind.

41 Two women will be grinding at the mill: one will be taken away, and one left behind.

42 Be on the alert therefore, for you do not know the day on which your Lord is coming.

43 But of this be assured, that if the master of the house had known the hour at which the robber was coming, he would have kept awake, and not have allowed his house to be broken into.

[Keep Awake = Within Their Lifetime

If the burglar who was going to rob the house wasn't even due until centuries after both house and owner had dissolved into dust, Jesus' advice to to the home owner (i.e. his Apostles) to "keep awake" is total and complete nonsense. Therefore, Jesus must have believed his Second Coming would occur within their lifetime. ]

44 Therefore you also must be ready; for it is at a time when you do not expect Him that the Son of Man will come.

["Be Ready" = Within Their Lifetime

It has been more than 1,970 years since Jesus sounded the alarm warning his Apostles (not you, bozo) about his Second Coming. Looking back with hindsight, him getting his Apostles all worked up about this event makes no sense at all, unless he himself expected to be back within their lifetime. One does not pull a fire alarm thousands of years in advance of the fire. And for those who think Jesus was NOT specifically limiting this statement to his Apostles, then WHY does he tell THEM to be ready for the Second Coming??? IF what Jesus was referring to was NOT to take place until 50 billion trillion years later, WHY IN HELL WOULD JESUS BE TELLING THEM of the First century to "be ready"???? The ONLY way this whole chapter makes sense is Jesus expecting and predicting his Second Coming in the First Century.]

45 "Who therefore is the loyal and intelligent servant to whom his master has entrusted the control of his household to give them their rations at the appointed time?

[Within Peter's Lifetime

"Who is the loyal and intelligent servant"??? Peter, that's who, as recorded earlier in this same book of Matthew, 16:18,19 … you are Peter, and on this rock I will build My church... And I will give to you the keys of the kingdom of Heaven. If the fulfillment of the Second Coming prophecy was not due until centuries after Peter's death, pray tell who is NOW the one the "master has entrusted the control of his household" of faith to???? Who is the one living today who's been appointed to "give them their rations at the appointed time"??? Who is NOW, Mr. & Mrs. Protestant, holding the keys??? You see what a tangled web you Bible thumpers have weaved, when at first you've practiced to deceive people about this chapter???]

46 Blessed is that servant whom his master when he comes shall find so doing!

[Within Peter's Lifetime

Jesus, in this story, tells of a departing master (i.e. Jesus) who puts a slave (i.e. Peter) in charge of the household until his return. In the story, the master returns within (not ten thousand years AFTER) the lifetime of the slave put in charge. Jesus (as seen previously) put Peter in charge of the household of faith until Jesus should have returned. Therefore Jesus, like the master in the story, expected to be back within Peter's lifetime.

If Jesus was NOT going to have returned within Peter's lifetime, Jesus would have made arrangements for NEW "slaves" to watch over his household until if and when he DID come back. To imply otherwise is to say that Jesus was a deadbeat dad, who just walked out on his family, abandoned them, without a second thought as to their welfare or who would be taking care of them.

The fact that Christianity, after the death of the Apostles, has been torn asunder time & again over the issue of "who's in charge here?" is proof that Jesus really was a deadbeat dad who orphaned his kids. Jesus neither returned when he promised his kids he would, nor did he clearly provide someone to watch over his kids in the meantime until he did return. (As for the knee-jerk response of "That's what the Holy Ghost is for", this "ghost" must have been asleep all this time, as it allowed thousands of Christian splinter groups to develop, all over this very issue of "who's in charge here."]

47 In solemn truth I tell you that he will give him the management of all his wealth.

48 But if the man, being a bad servant, should say in his heart, `My master is a long time in coming,'

[But It HAS Been A Long Time!!!

Jesus here condemns as a "bad servant" he who says Jesus' return has been "a long time in coming". Yet to say anything else in our era, is evidence of total and complete blindness to the passage of almost 2,000 (TWO THOUSAND!!!!!) years. The simple and undeniable fact is that his return HAS been "a long time in coming" and no amount of theological bullshit by Jesus or anyone else can change that FACT into a fiction. And every century that follows, Christians have to answer anew why their master has been a long time in coming. How many more centuries have to go by, before Christianity will admit the obvious? What's the limit? Will Christians admit that Jesus screwed up after ten thousand years? Ten million? Ten BILLION??? How about while the sun is going super nova and the whole universe is on its last legs of dying from heat death- will Christians THEN at least admit their Jesus messed up??? Probably not- Christians HATE to admit it when they're wrong.

Even a New Testament writer- disguising himself as the Apostle Peter, felt obligated to throw in his two cents on why their master seems to have orphaned them. He wrote that a short time is really a long time as long as you're not the one telling time (2nd Peter 3:8). I think he also sold used chariots on the side.

Modern Christians, via 2,000 years of disappointments, have been forced into becoming "bad servants;" for the return of Jesus has indeed been "a long time in coming". They themselves stand condemned by their own god when they point out his "delay" in returning. But it's not their fault- it's his- he never came back!!! He abandoned his kids. He walked out on them and left them orphans, and now they delude themselves into thinking daddy's really coming home after all. Umpteen years ago, their daddy walked out to the corner liquor store to buy a gallon of milk, and he never came back. Thousands of tears later these kids- now old and aged, still wait by the front door like dogs for their missing master, barking in excitement at every passing noise. ]

49 and should begin to beat his fellow servants, while he eats and drinks with drunkards;

50 the master of that servant will arrive on a day when he is not expecting him and at an hour of which he has not been informed;

51 he will treat him with the utmost severity and assign him a place among the hypocrites: there will be the weeping and the gnashing of teeth.

My Final Comments on Matthew 24

Some have suggested that there are two or three separate questions in verse #3 concerning future events, and therefore somehow because of this, the timing of these events may be thousands of years apart. To me, this seems like yet another attempt to "save the savior" from being the false prophet that he clearly has been documented to be.

Regardless of how many questions may have been originally asked by the Apostles at the beginning of the 24th chapter of Matthew, the man answering the questions was very explicit in that everything in this narrative would be fulfilled within a short time span, and certainly not to extend past the First Century THOUSANDS of years!!!

The following are clues that Jesus gave that indicate a short, rather than long, time span.

"Before long" the Apostles would hear of war rumors. (v. 6)

“Before long” comes from the Greek word "mello" which means to be on the point of doing or suffering

something, on the verge of, like a car teetering on the edge of a cliff.

" The early pains of childbirth " (v. 8)

This is another phrase that indicates there is not much time left till all these things are supposed

to take place. Pregnancy is, at most, a NINE month affair.

" Those who stand firm to the End" (v. 13)

This indicates that "The End" will be something these Apostles can reasonably hope to "stand firm to" long enough to see, i.e., within their lifetime. One can't "stand firm" to an end millions or billions of years distant, such as "stand firm until the sun goes super-nova".

" But immediately after those times of distress…" (v. 29)

This phrase certainly doesn't grant much time between the end of one event, and the start of the next.

" Then will appear the Sign of the Son of Man…" (v. 30)

This is the very next step past the "immediately" of the preceding verse. Again, no room for thousands of years of delays.

"So you also, when you see all these signs, you may be sure that He is near--at your very door.." (v. 33)

Now Jesus is telling his First Century Apostles that when they've seen all the signs described, the Second Coming will be just around the corner- "at your very door," which implies that the very next step in the sequence will bring him through the doorway. Again, another lock-in for the First Century era, and another lock-OUT of the theory that there may be millions of years involved.

"I tell you in solemn truth that the present generation will certainly not pass away without all these things having first taken place." (v. 34)

As if I needed any more evidence to show that this entire scenario is locked up into a First Century time frame, along comes Jesus to drive the killing nail into the theory that any other era besides the First Century could be possible. Regardless of how many questions were asked by the Apostles, "ALL
these things" in regard to the questions asked are predicted to take place before that present generation of then-living First Century men died off. Again, EVERY SINGLE THING mentioned within Matthew 24- ALL these things- are predicted to be fulfilled BEFORE that current generation then living have died off.

"But if the man, being a bad servant, should say in his heart, `My master is a long time in coming,'" (v. 48)

This cinches the argument that whatever questions may have been asked regarding their future, the answers were all due within the First Century. The fulfillment of the predictions, according to Jesus, would not be "a long time in coming."
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONCLUSION

Jesus prophesied all of the following within the 24th chapter of Matthew}

The End of the World
The Gathering Up of the Saints
Judgment Day
The Glorious "Second Coming"

Jesus specifically prophesied that all of the above events would take place before the end of the First Century, as indicated by his specifying the time limits being the lifetime of the people who heard him live back in 33 CE. These prophesied events did not take place in the time span laid down by Jesus himself. Therefore, the only logical and reasonable conclusion to be drawn is this: Regardless of anything else you may currently believe about Jesus, and regardless of how much you may currently love Jesus, nevertheless Jesus was as much a FALSE PROPHET as anybody else who makes false prophecies about the future. To conclude anything else is to be self-deceived and dishonest.
 
According to bible, Jesus raised the dead, fed hundreds with few fish/bread/wine, cured the sick etc etc. So logically, according to the same bible, he cannot be a liar and lunatic.
 
The nature of prophecy is not seen by those seeking to discredit Jesus. It is hidden from them because they are shutting their eyes to Him. It is not God hiding things from them but them themselves clsing their eyes and saying "Your not there , Your not real, nah nah nah nah nah"
Jesus was not talking about tearing down any temple built with human hands. Nor was he talking about building a human temple up in 3 days and nor was He talking to just the apostles. The Spirit speaks to all men. For those who have ears to hear ...

peace

c20
 
c20H25N3o said:
The nature of prophecy is not seen by those seeking to discredit Jesus. It is hidden from them because they are shutting their eyes to Him. It is not God hiding things from them but them themselves clsing their eyes and saying "Your not there , Your not real, nah nah nah nah nah"
Jesus was not talking about tearing down any temple built with human hands. Nor was he talking about building a human temple up in 3 days and nor was He talking to just the apostles. The Spirit speaks to all men. For those who have ears to hear ...

peace

c20

Since you can't disprove the arguement at all and making absolutely no attempt, God doesn't speak to you either.
 
Joeman said:
Mathew 24, verse by verse by Mark Smith

CONCLUSION

Jesus prophesied all of the following within the 24th chapter of Matthew}

The End of the World
The Gathering Up of the Saints
Judgment Day
The Glorious "Second Coming"

Jesus specifically prophesied that all of the above events would take place before the end of the First Century, as indicated by his specifying the time limits being the lifetime of the people who heard him live back in 33 CE. These prophesied events did not take place in the time span laid down by Jesus himself. Therefore, the only logical and reasonable conclusion to be drawn is this: Regardless of anything else you may currently believe about Jesus, and regardless of how much you may currently love Jesus, nevertheless Jesus was as much a FALSE PROPHET as anybody else who makes false prophecies about the future. To conclude anything else is to be self-deceived and dishonest.

A Study of Matthew Twenty-Four
by Wayne Jackson

Matthew 24 is a largely symbolic chapter of the New Testament that has been misinterpreted in two extreme directions.

"In this era of change, from one millennium to another, there may be no context that has become the focus of more controversy than the twenty-fourth chapter of Matthew’s Gospel record. This marvelous depository of prophetic literature has been victimized by considerable theological speculation. Several theories, spawned by a misunderstanding of this chapter, have generated confusion in the religious community.

There are two extremes relative to Matthew 24 which must be addressed.

First, there is the notion, advocated by the proponents of “realized eschatology,” that all Bible prophecy, including everything within Matthew 24 (e.g., the second coming of Christ, the judgment day, and the end of the world), was fulfilled in the event of Jerusalem’s destruction by the Romans in A.D. 70 (see King, 342-78). For a refutation of the major components of the A.D. 70 dogma, see the author’s book, The A.D. 70 Theory - A Review of the Max King Doctrine.

On the other hand, those who subscribe to the doctrine of “dispensational premillennialism” tend to view the whole of Matthew 24 as a sort of end-time manual which allows one to determine the characteristic events, and therefore the general time, at which the Lord will return to initiate his “millennial reign.”

For example, in his popular book, The Late Great Planet Earth, first published in 1976, Hal Lindsey argued that Matthew 24 contains the prophetical information which indicates that the “generation” witnessing the “rebirth of Israel” is the same generation that will observe the fulfillment of the “signs” of Matthew 24:1-33, consummated by the second coming of Christ. Inasmuch as the “rebirth of Israel” took place in 1948, and since Lindsey viewed a “generation,” as “something like forty years,” he felt confident in contending that the Lord’s return would be in the neighborhood of 1988 (43).

Later, as the 80s approached, Lindsey vacillated, stretched his 40-year timetable to as long as 100 years. He also confessed that he really did not know whether or not the terminal “generation” commenced with the rebirth of Israel (Eternity, 1/77). Billy Graham frequently has preached that “Matthew 24 is knocking at the door.” Neither of these views is correct.

The “Key” that Unlocks the Chapter

Occasionally, in a context characterized by some difficulty, there will be a “key” passage that unlocks the meaning of the material (cf. 1 Cor. 7:26). Such is the case with reference to Matthew 24. The significant verse is 34, wherein the Lord states:

“Verily I say unto you, this generation shall not pass away, till all these things be accomplished” (ASV).

Before giving consideration to some of the details of this verse, let us make a general observation. When there are several passages that deal with a topic, some of which are clearer than others, or some of which are framed in language more literal than others, the less-ambiguous, or more literal, are to be employed as the guiding force in the interpretation. This is fundamental exegetical procedure.

Now here is the point: Matthew 24:34 is a clear, literal statement from the Lord relative to the events previously discussed. This text, therefore, must be a prevailing guideline in the interpretation of this inspired narrative.

Crucial to understanding this verse, and the context overall, is the term “generation.” The Lord clearly indicated that “this” generation, i.e., His generation, would not “pass away,” until the events depicted in verses 4-33 were “accomplished,” i.e., fulfilled.

It has been common for dispensationalists to identify “generation” (Grk. genea) with the Jewish race, hence to contend that “the family of Israel” will be preserved until all “these things” are fulfilled (Scofield, 1034). Since the Jewish people are still extant, this concept allows dispensationalists to stretch the circumstances of Matthew 24 all the way to the present time. This view of the passage is seriously flawed.

While millennialists argue that genea means “race” in rare instances, some of them acknowledge that this is not the “more common and usual meaning of the word” (Archer, 339). Certainly there is no indication that genea is ever employed in the sense of “race” in the Gospel of Matthew – perhaps in the entire New Testament.

Genea is found 43 times in the New Testament. In 17 of these cases, the expression is “this generation.” In Matthew’s record, for example, “this generation” is found in 11:16; 12:41,42,45; 23:36, 24:34. A careful consideration of these passages provides a clear sense of the significance of the expression.

For instance, Jesus, surveying the Jewish wickedness of his day, warned of an impending punishment. He said:
“All these things [the consequences of the Jews’ rebellion] shall come upon this generation” (Mt. 23:36; emph. added).

Why is it millennialists contend that “this generation” in 23:36 is the generation devastated by the Romans in A.D. 70, but allege that “this generation” in 24:34 refers to a far-away “future day” (Barbieri, 75,78)?

Arndt & Gingrich suggest that genea denotes “basically, the sum total of those born at the same time, expanded to include all those living at a given time generation, contemporaries” (153).

McClintock & Strong state that the phrase “this generation” in Matthew 24:34 denotes “the generation of persons then living contemporary with Christ” (776).

Herodotus, the Greek historian, said that “three generations” fill up a “century” (II.142). To him, a “generation” was a period of some 33 years.

It should be obvious that the events of Matthew 24:4-34 have to do with the “generation” that was contemporary with the Lord. The Christians could look for certain tell-tale indicators, detailed by the Savior, and “know” that the Lord’s judgment upon Jerusalem was near (33).

But of “that [the] day” of the Son’s final coming, “knoweth no one” except the Father (36). There is thus a clear contrast between Christ’s temporal activity, chronicled prior to verse 34, and that of the Lord’s judgment at the end of time.

Jerusalem’s Destruction

As Jesus left the environs of the sacred area, his disciples directed attention to the temple. The Lord declared that this edifice would be “thrown down” so that not one stone would be left upon another (24:2). There is no doubt but that Jesus was uttering an oracle concerning the destruction of the city by the Romans (cf. Mt. 22:7; Lk. 21:20).

Later, on the mount of Olives, the disciples asked: “When shall these things [the demolition of the temple] be?” They also wanted to know what would be the “sign” of his “coming, and of the end of the world” (24:3).

R.C. Foster has well observed:
“Much of the confusion in interpreting the predictions of Jesus recorded in Matthew 24 and the parallel passages arises from the failure to see that the disciples asked and Jesus answered two questions: one, concerning the fall of Jerusalem; the other, concerning His second coming” (1187).

The disciples likely assumed that the destruction of the temple, and the end of the world, would occur at the same time. The Master sought to correct that impression, first, by discussing the Roman invasion (4-34), and then by commenting regarding his final coming to render universal judgment (35-51).

Jesus gave a series of clues which could be used by first-century saints to determine when Judaism’s fall would occur. A brief survey of these is as follows (see vss. 5-14):

a. False “messiahs” would arise.
b. There would be numerous military encounters.
c. Famines and earthquakes would occur.
d. Disciples would be persecuted.
e. Some would “stumble,” i.e., depart from the faith.
f. False prophets would be prevalent.
g. Decreasing spirituality on the part of some saints would be evident.
h. Those who endured would be delivered.
i. The gospel would be published far and wide during these four decades.


As unlikely as some of these prophetic declarations may seem to the skeptic, each of them was fulfilled by the time Jerusalem fell in A.D. 70. A more thorough discussion of these matters may be found in J. Marcellus Kik’s volume, Matthew 24.

Continuing, Christ declared that the impending invasion had been foretold in the book of Daniel (15). The Savior thus urged the disciples to be ready to flee the city, praying that God would providentially accommodate their departure (16-19).

He described the intensity of the Roman assault and promised that God would intervene for “the elect’s” sake (21-22). The disciples were not to be swayed by false claims that Jesus had personally arrived, because, when that event actually occurred, it would be globally evident (23-27).

The Jewish nation was described as a rotting carcass where birds of prey would gather (28). The fall of the Hebrew system is set forth in the sort of apocalyptic nomenclature that is characteristic of Old Testament literature, e.g., when the prophets pictorially portray the overthrow of Jehovah's enemies (cf. Isa. 13:10-11; 34:2ff; Ezek. 32:7-8).

All of this would be a “sign” of the fact that “the Son of man in heaven” was orchestrating these events (29-30). It is important to observe that the Lord would be accomplishing “these things” from heaven, not from some position upon the earth. The result of Judaism’s demise would be a great gospel harvest, reminiscent of the Jubilee celebration of Old Testament fame (31; cf. Lk. 4:17-21).

Finally, just as the ancient citizen of Palestine could determine the coming of summer by the budding of the fig tree, even so, by reflecting upon the signals given by Christ, the disciples would be able to discern the approach of the promised calamity (32-33).

The “Signs” of Matthew 24

Our major thrust now will be to argue the case that the “signs” of Matthew 24:4ff do not find their fulfillment in the final return of Christ.

First, whereas dispensationalists argue for a 20th century fulfillment of these “signs,” accompanied by a nuclear holocaust (Lindsey, 135-57), contextual indicators clearly reflect the fact that Jesus had reference to an ancient and local situation. Consider the following factors.

a. The impending destruction would involve the Jewish temple – “the holy place” (24:15), and the city of Jerusalem (Lk. 21:20) – not New York, Paris, etc., as alleged by Lindsey and others. The temple has lain in ruins for more than 19 centuries, and there is no evidence that it will ever be rebuilt.
b. The Jerusalem disciples were warned to flee unto the mountains (16) – hardly efficacious advice if a nuclear attack were envisioned. However, the early Christians understood this admonition, and fled to Pella, beyond the Jordan, when the Romans advanced toward the city (Eusebius III.5).
c. Christ warned: “Let him that is on the housetop not go down to take out the things that are in his house” (17). Again, such instruction hardly would be appropriate under the conditions of a nuclear assault. “On the house top” is the last place one would want to be!


But the admonition made perfect sense in view of the fact that the houses of old Jerusalem were flat-roofed and situated close to one another. Accordingly, Christians might proceed, by way of “the road of roofs,” to the edge of the city, thus escaping the invading soldiers (Edersheim, 93).

d. Jesus urged: “Pray ye that your flight be not in the winter” nor “on a sabbath” (20). This anticipates primitive conditions when winter travel could be rigorous; moreover, the gates of Jerusalem would be closed on the sabbath (Neh. 13:19), which would make escape more difficult.

Second, though the destruction of Jerusalem was seen as a sort of “coming” of Christ (cf. Mt. 10:23; 24:30,33; Lk. 21:27), i.e., in judgment upon the Hebrew nation, such was emphatically distinguished from the event known as the “second” coming (cf. Heb. 9:28). The Lord cautioned that if any false teacher should attempt to proclaim his visible “coming” in connection with Jerusalem’s fall, the bogus prophet was to be ignored, because the second coming would be apparent universally (23-27), whereas the destruction of Jerusalem was but a local event. Jerusalem’s fall would only reflect a “sign” of Christ’s providential “coming” in destructive judgment upon the holy city (29-31), not the Savior’s visible, final coming. More on this momentarily.

Third, it is very significant that the Lord, in connection with his discussion of the destruction of Jerusalem, introduced the remarkable prophecy that had been given five centuries earlier to the prophet Daniel. Jesus said:
“When therefore ye see the abomination of desolation, which was spoken of through Daniel the prophet, standing in the holy place (let him that readeth understand), then let them that are in Judea flee ...” (24:15,16).

The dispensational theory argues that the “abomination of desolation” is, from our vantage point, yet in the future. Supposedly, the prophetic focus is upon “the Antichrist,” alleged to be “a world dictator” who will “make the temple abominable” in the so-called “Tribulation” period just prior to the Lord’s second coming (Barbieri, 77). The problem with this view is this: Daniel connects the appearance of the “abomination that makes desolate” with the first coming of Christ, not the Lord’s second coming (Dan. 9:24-27)!

The Prophecy of Daniel’s Seventy Weeks

Let us, in this connection, briefly examine this fascinating prophecy. There is a three-fold thrust to the narrative.

First, it foretells the “Anointed” One’s advent, and what would be accomplished thereby. The Messiah would: finish transgression, bring an end to sins, make reconciliation for iniquity, usher in everlasting righteousness, seal up vision and prophecy, be anointed as the most holy one, make firm a new covenant, and terminate sacrifices.

These things are associated with Christ’s redemptive work at Calvary – not his second coming. To suggest that Daniel’s prophecy contains a “long parenthesis,” the “church age” (between the 69th and 70th weeks), which was wholly unknown to the Old Testament prophets, is without any rational basis.

Second, the prophecy sets forth a chronological time-frame in which the messianic events would take place. From the time of Judah’s commission to leave Babylonian captivity (in 457 B.C.), some 486 1/2 years (set forth in three increments – with “days” signifying “years”) would pass, thus terminating in the very year of Jesus’ death (see the author’s article on Daniel’s Prophecy of the Seventy Weeks, elsewhere in our Archives).

Finally, the terrible price for the Jews’ rejection of Jesus is graphically portrayed.
“As a result or consequence of the death of the Messiah one making desolate (i.e. the Roman prince Titus) appears ‘upon the wing of abominations’ (i.e. the pinnacle of the temple). By this language the complete destruction of the temple is signified” (Young, 679).

It is not without significance that the Jews themselves recognized that the destruction of Jerusalem in A.D. 70 was the fulfillment of Daniel’s prophecy. Josephus, the Jewish historian, stated that “Daniel also wrote concerning the Roman government, and that our country should be made desolate by them” (Antiquities, 10.11.7). This view of “Daniel’s seventy weeks,” commonly called the “traditional” view, “has been held with slight variation by most Biblical scholars until recent years” (Scott, 364).

Jesus’ Discussion of His Second Coming

Beginning in verses 35ff, the Lord turns his attention to the final day of history, the day of his ultimate “coming.” Heaven and earth will pass away, but the Savior’s words will remain inviolate.

Jesus shows that there had been a broad range of indicators – “all these things” – which, when observed, would allow the Christians to escape the horrible Roman invasion (33). Nevertheless, at the time of the second coming, no such signs would be provided; rather, the end of the world will occur in a dramatically unannounced fashion. Let us study some of the Lord’s arguments.

The Savior affirmed:
“But of that day and hour knoweth no one, not even the angels of heaven, neither the Son, but the Father only” (36).

First, observe the use of “but,” an adversative particle, which stresses a contrast between the previous material and that which follows. Professor Kik comments that this verse “gives immediate evidence of a change in subject matter” (101). In 4-34 the Lord had spoke of the “days” (plural) of tribulation associated with Jerusalem’s peril (19, 22, 29), but now it is “the day” (singular) – an expression commonly used of the final day of history (cf. 1 Cor. 3:13; 1 Thes. 5:4; 2 Tim. 1:12).

Second, observe that even Jesus himself did not know when “the day” of his coming (cf. 36) would be. Yet, he had given signs whereby others might “know” (33) that he was providentially “nigh” in the destruction of Jerusalem. Obviously the two events were not the same.

Is it not rather ironical that Christ, who gave these “signs,” did not know (while on earth) when his return would take place, but modern dispensationalists can read Matthew 24 and virtually pinpoint the time of the second coming! In 1992 Harold Camping, a syndicated television preacher, wrote:
“The results of this study indicate that the month of September of the year 1994 is to be the time for the end of history” (531).

Third, Christ cited an historical example which demonstrated that those of the pre-flood world were unaware of their impending doom “until the flood came, and took them all away.” The point being, “so shall be the coming of the Son of man” (39). There will be no specific, chronological warning!

Fourth, Jesus appealed to certain cultural circumstances to depict the sudden, unanticipated nature of his return. Two men would be working in the field; one would be taken, the other left (40). Two women will be grinding at the mill; one is taken, one is left (41). Then, in a parallel reference, two men are in bed; one is taken, the other is left” (Lk. 17:34).

One scholar has observed that these references contemplate different times of the day – early morning (grinding at the mill), mid-day (working in the field), and night (in bed), thus suggesting that when Christ returns, it will be day in some places, but night in others – day and night, at the same time (Collett, 277). This could not have reference to the destruction of Jerusalem, but must represent a “coming” of the Lord that will affect men globally.

Additionally, during Jerusalem’s calamity, it was not a matter of some taken and some left; all were taken! More than a million Jews were slaughtered and thousands of others were taken into foreign slavery (Josephus, Wars 6.9). Geldenhuys states that “not a single Jew was left alive in the city or its vicinity” (III.141).

Fifth, the Lord refers to a societal situation. The final day will be like the coming of a thief, who never warns or gives clues as to the time of his encroachment (42,43). The Christian thus is cautioned to “watch,” for in an hour “that ye think not the Son of man cometh” (44).

Again, the point is: The time of Jesus’ return cannot be anticipated. This clearly divorces the Lord’s second coming from those “signs” associated with the fall of Jerusalem.

Conclusion

As we conclude, we feel compelled to emphasize again:

1. Those who view Matthew 24 as a thematic unit, pertaining only to end-of-time things, are wrong in their view of this context. This is the error of dispensational premillennialism.
2. Those who would merge 24:4-34 with 35-51, asserting that the entire chapter refers to the destruction of Jerusalem, are also mistaken in their concept of this chapter.

SOURCES
Archer, Gleason (1982), The Encyclopedia of Bible Difficulties (Grand Rapids: Zondervan).

Arndt, Wilbur & Gingrich, F.W. (1967), A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature (Chicago: University of Chicago).

Barbieri, Louis (1983), “Matthew.” The Bible Knowledge Commentary (Wheaton, IL: Victor Books).

Camping, Harold (1992), 1994? (New York:Vantage Press).

Collett, Sidney (n.d.), All About The Bible. London (London: Fleming H. Revell Co).

Edersheim, Alfred (1957), Sketches of Jewish Social Life in the Days of Christ (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans).

Eusebius (1955), Ecclesiastical History (Grand Rapids: Baker).

Foster, R.C. (1971), Studies in the Life of Christ (Grand Rapids: Baker).

Geldenhuys, J. Norval (1960), “Luke,” The Biblical Expositor, Carl F.H. Henry, ed. (Philadelphia: A.J. Holman Co.).

Herodotus (1928), History of Herodotus (New York: Tudor).

Kik, J. Marcellus (1948), Matthew Twenty-Four (Philadelphia: Presbyterian & Reformed).

King, Max (1986), The Cross and The Parousia of Christ (Warren, OH: Parkman Road Church of Christ).

Jackson, Wayne (1990), The A.D. 70 Theory - A Review of the Max King Doctrine (Stockton, CA: Courier Publications).

Josephus, Flavius (1957), The Life and Works of Flavius Josephus (Philadelphia: John C. Winston Co).

Lindsey, Hal (1970), The Late Great Planet Earth (Grand Rapids: Zondervan).

Lindsey, Hal (1977), Eternity (January).

May, Cecil. “Matthew 24,” The Biblical Doctrine of Last Things, David Lipe, ed. (Magnolia, MS: Magnolia Bible College).

McClintock, John & Strong, James Cyclopedia of Biblical, Ecclesiastical, and Theological Literature (Grand Rapids: Baker), Vol. III.

Scofield, C.I. (1945), The Scofield Reference Bible (New York: Oxford Press).

Scott, J.B. (1975), “Seventy Weeks,” The Zondervan Pictorial Bible Encyclopedia, Merrill Tenney, ed. (Grand Rapids: Zondervan), Vol. Five.

Young, Edward J. (1954), “Daniel,” The New Bible Commentary, Davis, Stills, Kevan, eds. (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans).

(quoted from website http://www.christiancourier.com/archives/matthew24.htm)
 
There are Kings in the Kingdom of God but the Kings are such because of their great suffering for the Godhead in this life.
Whoever wants to be the greatest must be the least among you. The servant. Jesus served all with His spotless offering of Himself, His life, His blood. The prophets and apostles and saints all take their place because they have suffered for the truth of Christ.
Where do you fit in the Kingdom of God? Are you worthy to eat from the Tree of Eternal Life? Who will judge you worthy? Do you want to eat from that fruit?

peace

c20
 
Too much to read, but I guess I subscribe to the 70AD theory. Matthew 24 was mostly, if not completely, concerned with a time during the lifespans of those listening, or at least with that generation - and it does appear that those things did happen during the 64-70AD Jewish revolt, including the destruction of the temple and the removing of every stone from every other stone (the inside of the temple was coated with Gold and when the temple burned the gold melted and flowed between the stones causing the Roman soldiers to literally remove every stone looking for Gold).

This does not mean all of Revelations was fulfilled during the 70AD period.

I am not sure why some think there needs to be a third Temple. However, I would point out that there have already been three temples - Solomon, Zerubbabel, and Herod. Some say that Herod was only upgrading the second temple, but the records show that Herod completely leveled and enlarged the temple mount. Herod did not just upgrade/repair Zerubbabel's temple. Herod started over. This is not to say that the Jews will not attempt to rebuild some sort of a temple, but I can't find any basis for such a thing in the bible.
 
David F. said:
This does not mean all of Revelations was fulfilled during the 70AD period.

Ridiculous

"All These Things" = Complete Package

Jesus says emphatically that "all these things" would happen before his then current generation had passed away. Jesus presents the entire package as a "take it or leave it" situation, picking and choosing not allowed. Some Christian "explanations" of this verse have attempted to slice & dice the 24th chapter into "some for back then, some for now, and maybe… some for the future". This fragmenting of the chapter is not allowed by Jesus' clear statement "all these things". ANY Christian theory that tries to explain away this "problem chapter" has to treat the chapter as a whole, and explain how all of it happened or didn't happen. Of course, since the date for the destruction (v. 2) of the Jewish temple is firmly established in history at 70 AD, and everything in this chapter is promised within a short time frame, this entire chapter is thus locked into the First Century, from which it can not escape.

All these things =

The End of the World
The Gathering Up of the Saints
Judgment Day
The Glorious "Second Coming"

If any of these things that he talked about didn't happen, he wouldn't say all these things. He would have said some of these things. Again, he said this present generation will not pass away until ALL these things take place.

Your argument is like saying you promise your mom to wash dishes, take the garbage out, and do laundry, and say I will not go to bed before I do ALL THESE things. But you only took the garbage out and didn't do the other two. Next day when you were being scolded by your mom, you contradict yourself by saying Oh, I didn't mean to say I promise to do everything yesterday, but just some of the things.
 
Oh, so the word "generation" really is translated as "Jewish Race"? So the passage should read as "these Jewish race will not pass away until all these things have happened?"

I challenge you to find a bible that translate that way. Here are 52 known translations.

Fifty-Two Translations: Matthew 24:34.

(1) Truly I say to you, this generation will not pass away until all these things take place.

(2) This generation will not have passed before all this is accomplished.

(3) By no means may this generation be passing by until....

(4) This generation shall not pass away till all these things....

(5) Before the present generation passes away, these things will all happen.

(6) This generation will not pass away....

(7) In no wise shall this generation pass away until all these things shall happen.

(8) This generation will by no means pass away till all these things are fulfilled.

(9) This generation will not disappear till all this has taken place.

(10) This generation will certainly not pass away until all these things....

(11) ...this generation will not pass away....

(12) ...this generation will not pass away....

(13) ...this generation shall not pass away till....

(14) This generation may not pass away till all these things...

(15) ...this generation shall not pass away....

(16) ...this generation shall not pass away....

(17) ...this generation will not come to an end....

(18) This generation will not have passed away until all these things shall have taken place.

(19) This generation will not disappear until these things happen....

(20) This generation shall not pass until....

(21) In no way will this generation pass away until all these things have occurred.

(22) This generation shall not pass....

(23) This generation shall not pass away....

(24) Before this generation has passed away, all these things will have taken place.

(25) This generation will not pass away....

(26) This generation will by no means pass away until all these things occur.

(27) The present generation will not pass away until all this takes place.

(28) These people will not pass away till all this happens.

(29) This generation will not pass away....

(30) This generation shall not pass away....

(31) This generation will not pass away before all these things have taken place.

(32) This generation will not come to an end till all these things are complete.

(33) This generation will by no means pass away before all these things take place.

(34) This generation will not pass away....

(35) Before this generation passes away, all these things will happen.

(36) This generation will not pass away....

(37) This generation will not pass away....

(38) Indeed, I can give you solemn assurance that this generation will not have passed away before all this has taken place.

(39) This generation shall not pass till all these things be fulfilled.

(40) I tell you, even the present generation will not pass away, till all these things have taken place.

(41) The people of this day will not pass away before all these things have happened.

(42) The present generation shall not pass away till all these things happen.

(43) This present generation shall not pass away until all these things arrive.

(44) The present generation will not pass away till all this happens.

(45) I tell you this: the present generation will live to see it all.

(46) I tell you in solemn truth that the present generation will certainly not pass away without all these things having first taken place.

(47) I assure you, all these things will take place before this present generation passes on.

(48) I swear to God, this generation certainly won't pass into oblivion before all these things take place!

(49) I can promise you that some of the people of this generation will still be alive when all this happens.

(50) Truly, I tell you, this generation--that is, the whole multitude of people living at the same time, in a definite, given period--will not pass away till all these things taken together take place.

(51) I tell you the truth--all these things will happen while the people of this time are still living!

(52) Remember that all these things will happen before the people now living have all died.
 
Five Greek Lexicons: genea.

(1) The interval of time between father & son... from thirty to forty years those living in any one period; this present generation.

(2) A generation of mankind, a step in genealogy.

(3) A generation, an interval in time.

(4) The whole multitude of men living at the same time--Mt xxiv.34... used esp. of the Jewish race living at one and the same period.

(5) The sum total of those born at the same time... all those living at the same time... contemporaries... Mt. 24:34.
 
Thirteen Scholars: The "Race" Argument.

(1) Douglas Hare: Some have argued, for example, that "this generation" refers not to Jesus' contemporaries but to the Jewish nation or to the church. The linguistic evidence in favor of such proposals is not impressive.

(2) Alan Hugh M'Neile: "This generation" cannot mean the Jews as a people, believers in Christ, or the future generation that will experience these things. It must be the particular generation of Jews to whom, or of whom, the words were spoken.... It is impossible to escape the conclusion that Jesus, as Man, expected the End within the lifetime of His contemporaries.

(3) Clifton Allen: The meaning of "this generation" is much disputed. Efforts like those of Jerome, to make it mean the Jewish race, or of Origen and Chrysostom, to refer it to all Christians, are arbitrary, and are to be rejected. "This generation" refers to the contemporaries of Jesus.

(4) Heinrich Meyer: Ver. 34. Declaration to the effect that all this is to take place before the generation then living should pass away. (It is) well-nigh absurd (the) manner in which it has been attempted to force into the word genea such meaning as: The Creation, The Human Race, The Jewish Nation, The Class of Men Consisting of My Believers, The Generation of the Elect Now in Question, The Future Generation Which is to Witness Those Events... (The Second Coming) is to occur during the lifetime of the generation then existing.

(5) R.T. France: (Genea) has been taken to mean The Jewish Race, or Unbelieving Judaism. It is unlikely that such an improbable meaning for the noun would have been suggested at all without the constraint of apologetic embarrassment...! Jesus was wrong.

(6) Floyd Filson: The end... will come within a generation. Attempts to translate genea as: Human Race, Jewish Race are misguided; the word refers to the generation living when Jesus spoke.

(7) P. Davids, F.F. Bruce, M. Brauch: This has been regarded as a hard saying.... Plainly the idea that the human race is meant cannot be entertained; every description of (the end of the world) implies that human beings will be around to witness it.... Nor is there much more to be said for the idea the Jewish race is meant; there is no hint anywhere in the New Testament that the Jewish race will cease to exist before the end of the world. In any case, what point would there be in such a vague prediction? It would be as much as to say, "At some time in the indefinite future all these things will take place." Jesus' hearers could have understood him to mean only that "all these things" would take place within their generation.... The phrase always means the generation now living.

(8) Bible Commentary: ...seems to require us here to translate the word genea as meaning "generation," not, as it is sometimes rendered, race or people. (Generation) is the usual meaning.

(9) Rev. Patrick Fairbairn: It has been maintained by some that... our Lord identified generation with the Jewish race.... But that is a very forced explanation; and not a single example can be produced of an entirely similar use of the word. Whatever difficulties may hang around the interpretation of that part of Christ's discourse, it is impossible to understand by "the generation that was not to pass away" anything but the existing race of men living at the time when the word was spoken.

(10) Bruce Chilton: Some have sought to get around the force of (Mt. 24:34) by saying that the word generation here really means race, and that Jesus was simply saying that the Jewish race would not die out until all these things took place. Is that true? I challenge you: Get out your concordance and look up every New Testament occurrence of the word generation, and see if it ever means "race" in any other context.... Not one of these references is speaking of the entire Jewish race over thousands of years; all use the word in its normal sense of the sum total of those living at the same time. It always refers to contemporaries. In fact, those who say it means "race" tend to acknowledge this fact, but explain that the word suddenly changes its meaning when Jesus uses it in Matthew 24! We can smile at such a transparent error ....

(11) Dr. Albert Schweitzer: These words (Mt. 24:34) must be strained into meaning, not that generation, but the Jewish people. Thus by exegetical art they are saved forever, for the Jewish race will never die out.

(12) Rev. Milton Terry: The various meanings which, under the pressure of a dogmatic (crisis), have been put upon the phrase "this generation" must appear in the highest degree absurd to an unbiased critic. It has been explained (away) as meaning: The Human Race [Jerome], The Jewish Race [Dorner], The Race of Christian Believers [Chrysostom].

(13) Rev. Stuart Russell: It has been contended by many that in (Mt 24:34) the word genea should be rendered "race" or "nation...." But we think... without any shadow of doubt that the expression "this generation" so often employed by our Lord, always refers solely and exclusively to His contemporaries, the Jewish people of His own period.
 
Back
Top