Hi AlphaNumeric; I know that the math to describe particle theory is very complicated and deeply respect all those who can master it.
I don't think you do understand just how complicated. To someone who hasn't done high school maths, 1st year undergraduate maths is staggeringly complicated. When I was in my 1st year, I looked at the 2nd year quantum mechanics stuff and wondered how I'd ever be able to do it. Now I look at it and think "God, that stuff is easy". There are some things which I'll NEVER be able to look at, no matter how hard or long I work at them, and say "God, that stuff is easy".
That is the kind of material you get Nobel Prizes in QFT or Millenium Prizes for.
If you think that it's just a matter of Ben, myself, Prometheus and Guest sitting in a room, with a whiteboard and a pile of paper and pencils, for a week and we'd knock out a theory of everything, you don't realise how complicated this stuff is. I
do sit in a room with such people for
years and hardly scratch the surface. I collaborate with certain people in my area of work and we'll sit in a room and stare at a black board for 3 days, for 15 hours a day, talking about just our tiny tiny area and after that we
might.
MIGHT have had a brain wave enough to eventually write just one paper in our area of work. Which gets us one step down one very very long path (out of hundreds, thousands or millions of paths) towards the main highway which eventually leads to the intersection which has, if we don't miss it, a turning for the bridge over to the area where we think the theory of everything lives.
Now I'm not saying that Prometheus, Guest, Ben and myself in a room discussing physics and maths, showing one another our work and perhaps doing Q&A with forum questions/discussion topics wouldn't be interesting, it'd be something I imagine I'd very much enjoy and learn a lot from, as would any observer/listener/viewer, but there's a long way from that and a ToE.
The graphics stuff I'm playing around with draws Neutrons to scale as shell structures and attempts to bounce them off each other. It don't work yet. I can't figure out the bounce equation
The software just makes the graphics for visualization purposes.
Except that experiments show that they don't work like that. Besides, your model doesn't explain things like beta decay or anything which we explain via the electroweak model. There's a ton of experimental evidence for the Ws and Zs. Similarly with different quarks, you cannot explain the enormous slew of hadronic matter, all of which match the quark model so well.
And have you bothered to look into
The Eightfold Way, which gives an explaination of the relationship between, mass, spin, charge and quark make up?
Here is an explaination of how to learn such things. Feel free to ask questions, I transcribed those notes from the lecture course.
You don't realise that your model is a failure and cannot do things our models already do. I've told you this, shown you this and explain to you this. You don't understand and you don't want to know. Delusion is a powerful thing and cranks have it in gobs and gobs.