TW Scott:
As usual, you didn't read what I wrote carefully enough. Go back and read it again.
How is dousing somone with red paint not assualt?
I never claimed it was not assault.
How is breaking into a french boutique and smearing red paint on the inside of the windows not B&E and Defacement of property?
I never claimed this was not defacement of property. In fact, I never mentioned it.
How is trying to stop hunting on private land with a court order supposedl;y signed by the very Judge they were trying to stop hunting not Forgery and Identity Theft?
I don't remember discussing this.
How trespassing on a farm and releasing 15000 mink not Trespassing and Grand Theft?
I don't remember making claims about these acts.
etc. etc.
People belonging to such agencies as PETA have no respect for the law. They disobey it whenever they feel they can get away with it.
Once again, you are sadly uninformed.
First, you lump everybody into the same basket. Not all people who belong to PETA, to take your example, break the law.
Second, you are incorrect to paint members of PETA as having "no respect for the law". Those people pay their taxes. They obey the road rules. They don't rob banks.
Third, you are obviously unaware that animal activists in groups such as PETA often go out of their way to publicise their activities. How do you think the story of the minks got into the media? These people do not disobey the law "when they think they can get away with it". Often, they set out specificly and publicly to break the law.
Would you like some additional education on
why they might act that way? I'm sure you're not interested. You're stuck in a narrow mindset that says that all laws are just, because some lawmaker said so. In your world, there's no such thing as an unjust law. If the government declared murder mandatory tomorrow, you'd be the first to grab your gun and start shooting people, I'm sure.